Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nixos/ombi: add baseUrl option #284311

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Elfahor
Copy link

@Elfahor Elfahor commented Jan 27, 2024

The base URL GUI option of Ombi is known to be broken, which is very inconvenient for reverse proxying with subfolders. The suggested method (in Ombi's documentation) is to pass the --baseurl command-line parameter.

Description of changes

This commit thus adds an option to set this parameter to the NixOS Ombi module.

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

The base URL GUI option of Ombi is known to be broken, which is very inconvenient
for reverse proxying with subfolders. The suggested method is to pass the
--baseurl command-line parameter.
This commit thus adds an option to set this parameter to the NixOS Ombi module.
@github-actions github-actions bot added 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: module (update) This PR changes an existing module in `nixos/` labels Jan 27, 2024
@NixOSInfra NixOSInfra added the 12. first-time contribution This PR is the author's first one; please be gentle! label Jan 27, 2024
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels Jan 27, 2024
nixos/modules/services/misc/ombi.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
nixos/modules/services/misc/ombi.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Elfahor
Copy link
Author

Elfahor commented Feb 10, 2024

I have successfully tested these changes on a server.

@Elfahor Elfahor requested a review from fsnkty February 17, 2024 13:41
Copy link
Member

@fsnkty fsnkty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changes seem fine, id be more descriptive in the enable option about what the service is though..

also seen in the module unrelated to these changes, would be nice to see systemd.tmpfiles.settings used insteead.

@Elfahor
Copy link
Author

Elfahor commented Feb 18, 2024 via email

@fsnkty
Copy link
Member

fsnkty commented Feb 20, 2024

Should I make these changes in this PR or open an other one?

Id assume same PR different commit but am unsure, either way neither are obligations of yours, just random things id like to see personally.

I'd wait for someone more familiar with contributing to get back to you on that one if you wish to make the changes.

@Elfahor
Copy link
Author

Elfahor commented Feb 20, 2024 via email

@wegank wegank added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person label Mar 8, 2024
@eclairevoyant eclairevoyant added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Apr 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@eclairevoyant eclairevoyant left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, thanks for the contribution! Please rebase to drop the merge commit, as well as to drop the mdDoc removal commit (this was handled treewide). (Of course, the new option shouldn't use lib.mdDoc either, as it was removed from nixpkgs.)

Otherwise the changes look good and I'll be happy to merge afterwards.

@Elfahor
Copy link
Author

Elfahor commented Apr 15, 2024 via email

@Elfahor
Copy link
Author

Elfahor commented May 24, 2024

Unfortunately, I don't think this is going to work. Closing.

@Elfahor Elfahor closed this May 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: module (update) This PR changes an existing module in `nixos/` 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person 12. first-time contribution This PR is the author's first one; please be gentle!
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants