zfs: update latestCompatibleLinuxPackages

[alyssais]

Description of changes

ZFS no longer tries to use GPL-only symbols on aarch64.

Tested by building nixosTests.zfs.stable (modified to use Linux 6.6) and nixosTests.zfs.unstable.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[amarshall]

See also #291402

[alyssais]

Yeah, we'll get a conflict when one of these PRs merges. It's an orthogonal change though.

[amarshall]

Code seems good and reasonable. I do not have an aarch64 machine, so only did nix-build ---A pkgsCross.aarch64-multiplatform.linuxKernel.packages.linux_6_6.zfs to test module build.

[adamcstephens]

Thanks, nice to see this finally cleaned up. :)