treewide: remove unused occurence of fetchFromGitHub argument

[isabelroses]

Description of changes

#313981

These files were left unchanged due to them calling other files with the fetchFromGitHub arg.

"pkgs/servers/foundationdb/default.nix"
"pkgs/games/fteqw/default.nix"
"pkgs/development/compilers/zig/0.11.nix"
"pkgs/development/compilers/zig/0.12.nix"
"pkgs/development/compilers/zig/0.10.nix"

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[Sigmanificient]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 314910 run on x86_64-linux 1

[Sigmanificient]

0 rebuilds!

[cafkafk]

After this gets merged, it should probably be added to .git-blame-ignore-revs, ty for noticing and fixing this :D

[Sigmanificient]

After this gets merged, it should probably be added to .git-blame-ignore-revs, ty for noticing and fixing this :D

Maybe the whole list of commits from #313981 should gets git blame ignored. In that case, it might be better to deal with it once the whole issue is done?

[cafkafk]

After this gets merged, it should probably be added to .git-blame-ignore-revs, ty for noticing and fixing this :D

Maybe the whole list of commits from #313981 should gets git blame ignored. In that case, it might be better to deal with it once the whole issue is done?

I don't see why they would need to be tied together to be honest, i think it's much better to just get it done as it comes. Let's move that discussion to the issue thou, I don't think it should block this.