-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
python312Packages.numpy_2: 2.0.1 -> 2.1.0 #336284
Conversation
Nixfmt issues are because NixOS/nixfmt#224 is not released yet. |
Result of 22 packages marked as broken and skipped:
202 packages failed to build:
12 packages built:
|
Result of 22 packages marked as broken and skipped:
183 packages failed to build:
36 packages built:
|
Result of 14 packages marked as broken and skipped:
197 packages failed to build:
44 packages built:
|
Result of 56 packages marked as broken and skipped:
178 packages failed to build:
12 packages built:
|
Wow very impressive how you have all of these platforms :). Do all of these failure relate to the version of numba not supported? Can you give please an example of a build log failure? |
OK so the numba version issue is a bit annoying. I have a workaround ready for it, but I hope to not apply it and wait for a numba release. I'll put this as a draft. |
7bff4a4
to
aedabba
Compare
I am using the community builders ! |
This is the
|
Building the following locally drains all memory from my machine and eventually fails... Not sure why, let's see ofborg dealing with it: @ofborg build python312Packages.numba.passthru.tests.withSandbox |
Add a temporary hack to pretend the version as 0.61.0dev0
2ae99da
to
4865fc4
Compare
https://github.com/ofborg build python312Packages.numba.passthru.tests.withSandbox |
Result of 26 packages marked as broken and skipped:
8 packages failed to build:
217 packages built:
|
Result of 10 packages marked as broken and skipped:
12 packages failed to build:
237 packages built:
|
@ofborg build python312Packages.numba.passthru.tests.withSandbox |
Result of 56 packages marked as broken and skipped:
30 packages failed to build:
164 packages built:
|
Result of 28 packages marked as broken and skipped:
28 packages failed to build:
192 packages built:
|
This seems to be in a pretty good state. Should it be marked as ready @doronbehar ? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Diff looks fine to me. Thanks !
buildInputs = lib.optionals cudaSupport [ cudaPackages.cuda_cudart ]; | ||
buildInputs = [ | ||
# Not propagating it, because it numba can work with either numpy_2 or numpy_1 | ||
numpy_2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👎
fixed in #338884
Description of changes
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.