python312Packages.scipy: 1.14.0 -> 1.14.1

[doronbehar]

Description of changes

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[GaetanLepage]

Could you use this opportunity to:

• nativeBuildInputs -> build-system
• propagatedBuildInputs -> dependencies
• remove the with lib; from meta
• Organize the inputs in this style

Not mandatory, but as we don't touch this derivation too often it might be a good idea.

[doronbehar]

Could you use this opportunity to:

* `nativeBuildInputs` -> `build-system`

* `propagatedBuildInputs` -> `dependencies`

* remove the `with lib;` from `meta`

* Organize the inputs in [this style](https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/stable/#buildpythonpackage-function)

Not mandatory, but as we don't touch this derivation too often it might be a good idea.

Good idea. Thanks :) Will merge when CI is mostly green.

[doronbehar]

In general I don't like this diff noise..

[doronbehar]

Can be merged when CI is green.

[GaetanLepage]

Thanks for taking the time to double-check the changes :)

[doronbehar]

BTW since I noticed you have an affinity to scientific Python packages, maybe you'd like to share your opinion on #327437 ?

[GaetanLepage]

BTW since I noticed you have an affinity to scientific Python packages, maybe you'd like to share your opinion on #327437 ?

Sure, I will have a look later :)

[SuperSandro2000]

👍🏼 (on the wheel removal)

[SuperSandro2000]

I personally would just sort this alphabetically but we can keep it now that you done it :)

[dotlambda]

Some of these belong in nativeBuildInputs. Also, numpy is missing.

[doronbehar]

Some of these belong in nativeBuildInputs. Also, numpy is missing.

The existence and not identicallity of both nativeBuildInputs and build-system is new to me. I am still surprised that you require adding to build-system packages that are already part of dependencies. I also don't think enforcing this is worth it. I plan to open a discourse thread about these policies you started to enforce lately, and that we discussed in the related numpy/scipy threads.

[dotlambda]

#333221 (comment)

[mweinelt]

Looks like this didn't bump scipy to 1.14.1 after all. 🤷

[doronbehar]

Damn you are right! Thanks for commenting here, probably got lost in one of the rebases here. The real update is now in #351879 .