Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

zluda: 3 -> 4-unstable-2025-01-28 #383757

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

DerDennisOP
Copy link
Contributor

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@DerDennisOP DerDennisOP changed the title zluda: 3 -> 4 zluda: 3 -> 4-unstable Feb 20, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels Feb 20, 2025
@DerDennisOP DerDennisOP changed the title zluda: 3 -> 4-unstable zluda: 3 -> 4-unstable-2025-01-28 Feb 20, 2025
Copy link
Member

@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, lets wait a few days for the maintainer

@wegank wegank added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person label Feb 21, 2025
@errnoh
Copy link
Contributor

errnoh commented Feb 21, 2025

Sadly I don't have a good setup to test this right now, feel free to move forward with the merge. I'm in process of trying to get the environment set up again in the future.

(but glad to see that we can remove the cargo duct tape)

Btw it's not like I'm that committed on this package myself, I just happened to be interested in building it originally. If there are people interested in taking over the maintainership I'm ok passing it forward (or sharing it).

@errnoh errnoh mentioned this pull request Feb 22, 2025
13 tasks
@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

Do we need the mlir update for this to build?

In file included from /build/source/mlir/lib/Dialect/Rock/Transforms/ViewToTransform.cpp:14:
/build/source/mlir/include/mlir/Conversion/TosaToRock/TosaToRock.h:21:10: fatal error: 'mlir/Conversion/RocMLIRPasses.h.inc' file not found
#include "mlir/Conversion/RocMLIRPasses.h.inc"
         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 error generated.

@DerDennisOP
Copy link
Contributor Author

DerDennisOP commented Feb 23, 2025

Do we need the mlir update for this to build?

In file included from /build/source/mlir/lib/Dialect/Rock/Transforms/ViewToTransform.cpp:14:
/build/source/mlir/include/mlir/Conversion/TosaToRock/TosaToRock.h:21:10: fatal error: 'mlir/Conversion/RocMLIRPasses.h.inc' file not found
#include "mlir/Conversion/RocMLIRPasses.h.inc"
         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 error generated.

zluda3 is broken, so I updated it.

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

sure, but rocmlir-rock through miopen doesn't compile so I can't test this.

@DerDennisOP
Copy link
Contributor Author

DerDennisOP commented Feb 23, 2025

sure, but rocmlir-rock through miopen doesn't compile so I can't test this.

Yeah i tested it with the rocm update. It will build with the new version. You should be able to safely merge it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants