nixosTests: Port more tests

[tfc]

Motivation for this change

#72828

Things done

• Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
• Built on platform(s)
  • NixOS
  • macOS
  • other Linux distributions
• Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
• Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
• Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
• Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

cc @flokli @worldofpeace

[tfc]

removed the proxy test because of utf problems and moved it to PR #78555 where this is fixed.

[tfc]

@GrahamcOfBorg test ihatemoney buildbot

[tfc]

@GrahamcOfBorg test keymap

[tfc]

@GrahamcOfBorg test ihatemoney keymap buildbot

[worldofpeace]

I've reviewed

• buildbot.nix
• ihatemoney.nix

and I'm pretty confident in them.

I did look over the testScript in keymap.nix and it looks fine, but the quoting stuff is a bit fuzzy for me. So I think someone more familiar with that specific test should look at it.

[flokli]

I really appreciate the porting effort. But as I already explained in some other "bulk PRs", if this would have been 3 separate PRs, it'd be much easier to just merge the two reviewed ones.

[worldofpeace]

I really appreciate the porting effort. But as I already explained in some other "bulk PRs", if this would have been 3 separate PRs, it'd be much easier to just merge the two reviewed ones.

True. This is how I've been doing my own PRs so they don't get blocked.
For example, the two tests I mentioned I'm confident in, but are blocked by the third.

[tfc]

@flokli @worldofpeace Currently it is the most comfortable workflow for me to sit down for an hour before or after work, port 1-3 tests, open a PR for them and this is how it happens.

But you're right, one test per PR has mentioned advantages and i will do it like that in the future.

[worldofpeace]

@flokli @worldofpeace Currently it is the most comfortable workflow for me to sit down for an hour before or after work, port 1-3 tests, open a PR for them and this is how it happens.

But you're right, one test per PR has mentioned advantages and i will do it like that in the future.

And we totally appreciate that as well 🎊

[tfc]

@flokli you were right, i pythonified the whole thing and it looks a bit more structured now.

[tfc]

@GrahamcOfBorg test keymap

[flokli]

@tfc Thanks! This is much more understandable now :-)

[flokli]

@GrahamcOfBorg test keymap