Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nixosTests.taskserver: Port to python #93413

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2020
Merged

Conversation

liff
Copy link
Contributor

@liff liff commented Jul 18, 2020

Motivation for this change

Making progress on #72828. Very much just a mechanical translation.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@ofborg ofborg bot added 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux labels Jul 18, 2020
@rnhmjoj rnhmjoj requested a review from tfc July 26, 2020 22:10
@tfc
Copy link
Contributor

tfc commented Jul 27, 2020

Wow this is one of the longer nixos tests. Thank you for porting this!

@liff liff force-pushed the taskserver-python-test branch from 75b010c to 6b1c347 Compare July 27, 2020 09:12
@tfc
Copy link
Contributor

tfc commented Aug 3, 2020

@GrahamcOfBorg test taskserver

pass


def setup_clients_for(org, user, extra_init=no_extra_init):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not use None instead and call the function IFF extra_init is not None?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to keep the call site slightly simpler, I guess. This is longer than it needs to be, though, since the no_extra_init function could be replaced by just lambda: None.

@liff liff deleted the taskserver-python-test branch November 14, 2024 10:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants