Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CMIP6 CMOR-ization & ESGF-publication] NorESM2-MM - ssp585 #151

Closed
matsbn opened this issue Nov 26, 2019 · 26 comments
Closed

[CMIP6 CMOR-ization & ESGF-publication] NorESM2-MM - ssp585 #151

matsbn opened this issue Nov 26, 2019 · 26 comments
Assignees

Comments

@matsbn
Copy link

matsbn commented Nov 26, 2019

Mandatory information:

Full path to the case(s) of the experiment on NIRD
/projects/NS9560K/FRAM/noresm/cases

experiment_id
ssp585

model_id
NorESM2-MM

CASENAME(s) and years to be CMORized
NSSP585frc2_f09_tn14_20191105, 2015-2100

Optional information

parent_experiment_id
historical

parent_experiment_rip
r1i1p1f1

parent_time_units
'days since 1850-01-01' atm/lnd
'days since 0001-01-01' ice
'days since 1800-01-01' ocn

branch_method
'Hybrid-restart from year 2015-01-01 of historical'

other information

@YanchunHe
Copy link
Collaborator

sync all data to NS9034K

@jgriesfeller
Copy link
Collaborator

Started syncing to /projects/NS9560K/noresm/cases/NSSP585frc2_f09_tn14_20191105 as ns9560K has enough quota for 14TB

@YanchunHe
Copy link
Collaborator

updates: cmorisation has been ongoing for this experiments for some days.

@YanchunHe
Copy link
Collaborator

cmorized and ready to be published to ESGF

data path

  • /tos-project1/NS9034K/CMIP6/.cmorout/NorESM2-MM/ssp585
  • /tos-project1/NS9034K/CMIP6/ScenarioMIP/NCC/NorESM2-MM/ssp585

version

  • v20191108

*sha256sum

  • /tos-project1/NS9034K/CMIP6/ScenarioMIP/NCC/NorESM2-MM/ssp585/.r1i1p1f1.sha256sum_v20191108

@monsieuralok
Copy link
Collaborator

@matsbn @YanchunHe published

@YanchunHe
Copy link
Collaborator

cmorized new data version to fix bugs reported in issues: #109 #178 #179

data path

  • /projects/NS9034K/CMIP6/ScenarioMIP/NCC/NorESM2-MM/ssp585
  • /projects/NS9034K/CMIP6/.cmorout/NorESM2-MM/ssp585

version

  • v20200218

sha256sum

  • /projects/NS9034K/CMIP6/ScenarioMIP/NCC/NorESM2-MM/ssp585/.r1i1p1f1.sha256sum_v20200218

@YanchunHe YanchunHe reopened this Feb 27, 2020
@monsieuralok
Copy link
Collaborator

@YanchunHe published

@YanchunHe
Copy link
Collaborator

Cmorized with additional iLAMB variables (#262), AERday zg500 (#263) and corrected fNup (#251).

They are ready to be published to ESGF.

data path

  • /projects/NS9034K/CMIP6/.cmorout/NorESM2-MM/ssp585
  • /projects/NS9034K/CMIP6/ScenarioMIP/NCC/NorESM2-MM/ssp585

version

  • v20210203

sha256sum

  • /projects/NS9034K/CMIP6/ScenarioMIP/NCC/NorESM2-MM/ssp585
  • .r1i1p1f1.sha256sum_v20210203

@monsieuralok
Copy link
Collaborator

@YanchunHe published

@DirkOlivie
Copy link

@YanchunHe I have rerun the SSP585 simulation with NorESM2-MM. The aim of the run was (1) to have extra high-frequency fields to force FLEXPART (these should not be cmorized), and (2) to have extra monthly aerosol diagnostics (hopefully these can be cmorized).

The new simulation is called NSSP585frc2_f09_tn14_20200919 and is on NS2345K. The results of this simulation are bit-identical to the original simulation (NSSP585frc2_f09_tn14_20191105). I have checked that.

We are mainly interested in the cmorization of missing AERmon fields. Is it possible to run the cmorization for AERmon?

It is probably not a good idea to run the cmorization for all model components and all frequencies again. This new simulation contains for the atmosphere only the high-frequency fields needed for FLEXPART, and not the standard CMIP6 high frequency output (I think the cmorization would run into problems treating the high-frequency fields).

I hope this is possible.
Dirk

@YanchunHe YanchunHe reopened this Mar 12, 2021
@YanchunHe
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @DirkOlivie, it is nearly straightforward to redo the cmorisation for only the AERmon fields, as long as they are in cam.h0 file.

I will try this and keep the updates here.

@YanchunHe
Copy link
Collaborator

cmorized burtFractionAll related to issue #286

data path

  • /projects/NS9034K/CMIP6/.cmorout/NorESM2-MM/ssp585/v20210818
  • /projects/NS9034K/CMIP6/ScenarioMIP/NCC/NorESM2-MM/ssp585

version

  • v20210818

sha256sum

  • /projects/NS9034K/CMIP6/ScenarioMIP/NCC/NorESM2-MM/ssp585
  • .r1i1p1f1.sha256sum_v20210818

@YanchunHe YanchunHe reopened this Aug 31, 2021
@monsieuralok
Copy link
Collaborator

@YanchunHe published

@monsieuralok
Copy link
Collaborator

@YanchunHe retracted

@YanchunHe
Copy link
Collaborator

@monsieuralok Could you retract all the data of this experiment.

It will be extended and will be publish again. Refer to #326

@monsieuralok
Copy link
Collaborator

@YanchunHe YanchunHe added CMORize and removed Retract labels Aug 29, 2023
@YanchunHe
Copy link
Collaborator

YanchunHe commented Aug 30, 2023

CMORized the whole SSP585 2015 to 2100 with extension from 2101 to 2298, see #326

data path

  • /projects/NS9034K/CMIP6/.cmorout/NorESM2-MM/ssp585
  • /projects/NS9034K/CMIP6/ScenarioMIP/NCC/NorESM2-MM/ssp585

version

  • v20230616

sha256sum
/projects/NS9034K/CMIP6/ScenarioMIP/NCC/NorESM2-MM/ssp585

  • .r1i1p1f1.sha256sum_v20230616

@oyvindseland
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi I have received a question from the community on when the SSP585 data will be available again. Given the label ESGF publish I presume that it is a matter of days?

@YanchunHe
Copy link
Collaborator

I have an impression, the ESGF is now quite healthy, so it should be published soon. @monsieuralok has better command on this.

@monsieuralok
Copy link
Collaborator

@oyvindseland @YanchunHe published it

YanchunHe added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2023
NorESM2-MM ssp585 with extension: #151, #326; NorESM2-MM piControl (#140), historical (#143) ssp126 (#152), ssp245 (#149), ssp370 (#150) with 3-hourly precipitation.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants