Clarify how to model binary data in 3.1 #3727
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Content-Encoding
HTTP header field andcontentEncoding
#2476Note: I wrote most of this quite some time ago and just tidied it up now... please review it carefully as I might have missed some unfinished aspect.
This reorganizes binary data-related guidance into a "Working With Binary Data" section, as has already been done in 3.0.4.
This includes more detailed guidance on when various approaches to binary data make sense (e.g. you cannot stuff raw binary into JSON no matter what you put in your Schema Object, and while you can base64-encode entire message bodies, it takes up a lot more space for no clear benefit).
Also noted that only
multipart
media types with named parts are supported, as they are modeled as an object.