Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[14.0][FIX] account_mass_reconcile: reconciles not being sorted #649

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 14.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

iTecan
Copy link

@iTecan iTecan commented Apr 24, 2024

Original Code:
reconciles.sorted(key=_get_date) # WRONG

New code:
reconciles = reconciles.sorted(key=_get_date) # OK

In the original code the reconciles aren't sorted as the variable is not being updated, this causes to getting the same values and wrong order.
This also happens in 15.0

@iTecan iTecan changed the title [14.0[FIX] reconciles not being sorted [14.0][FIX] reconciles not being sorted Apr 26, 2024
@iTecan iTecan changed the title [14.0][FIX] reconciles not being sorted [14.0][FIX] account_mass_reconcile: reconciles not being sorted Apr 29, 2024
Copy link

@kaynnan kaynnan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 1, 2024

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Sep 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants