README: Add PSC's in charge

[rousseldenis]

I don't know if it's possible, but this could be a help for contributors to have PSC's name and links (to odoo-community.org) in repos README.

[rousseldenis]

@OCA/core-maintainers

[dreispt]

Makes sense to me.
Could be an additional question for copier.

[legalsylvain]

The information is in the OCA instance. Dont know how to recover it to générate readme...

[rousseldenis]

The information is in the OCA instance. Dont know how to recover it to générate readme...

Yes that's a point I don't have answer.

[hbrunn]

isn't https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/blob/master/tools/oca_projects.py where the info about PSCs/repos lives?

[dreispt]

I suggested to keep it simple, and make it a copier question.

[yajo]

It can be done by a controller in https://odoo-community.org, where all that information is already stored.

For example, Copier could just put a link to https://odoo-community.org/psc-teams/find-by-repo?repo=OCA/project in the readme which just makes a 302 redirection towards https://odoo-community.org/psc-teams/project-service-28.

[francesco-ooops]

Any update on this? I resorted to this workaround 😅

[github-actions]

There hasn't been any activity on this issue in the past 6 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this issue to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

[legalsylvain]

I suggested to keep it simple, and make it a copier question.

Not sure it's simple if we duplicate the information in two places. (in odoo-community + in copier answers file). There will be harder to maintain, don't you think ?

[simahawk]

Good news: we are going to manage repos via github actions. I'm sure we can handle this too.
We are going to have a talk during OCA days but if you want to have a look at the prototype, here you go https://github.com/OCA-devel/repo-maintainer 😉

[pedrobaeza]

Why having a different organization for such repo?

[simahawk]

Why having a different organization for such repo?

It's temporary. We needed a sandbox to play with. We'll move what's needed to OCA when ready.