Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[14.0][MIG] mis_builder_budget_operating_unit #376

Merged

Conversation

kittiu
Copy link
Member

@kittiu kittiu commented May 12, 2021

Standard migration, no change.

Copy link
Contributor

@AaronHForgeFlow AaronHForgeFlow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 LGTM

@TeoGoddet
Copy link

Hello !
What is the status of this PR ?

@AaronHForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @TeoGoddet it needs at least another formal approval

Copy link

@hitrosol hitrosol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@AaronHForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

/ocabot migration mis_builder_budget_operating_unit

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added this to the 14.0 milestone Dec 2, 2021
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

On my way to merge this fine PR!
Prepared branch 14.0-ocabot-merge-pr-376-by-AaronHForgeFlow-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2021
16 tasks
@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 36fe333 into OCA:14.0 Dec 2, 2021
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 75b706c. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants