Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

14.0 mig sale operating unit #470

Closed
wants to merge 25 commits into from
Closed

14.0 mig sale operating unit #470

wants to merge 25 commits into from

Conversation

cramosh
Copy link

@cramosh cramosh commented Apr 19, 2022

No description provided.

@AaronHForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

/ocabot migration sale_operating_unit

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added this to the 14.0 milestone Apr 19, 2022
@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot mentioned this pull request Apr 19, 2022
16 tasks
@cramosh
Copy link
Author

cramosh commented Apr 19, 2022

@AaronHForgeFlow Travis is indicating errors in the module tests that have nothing to do with the sale_operating_unit. How to proceed

@AaronHForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

We need to migrate the branch 14.0 to use github actions instead of travis. That will be done in separate PR, I will check how to do that.

@cramosh
Copy link
Author

cramosh commented Apr 19, 2022

We need to migrate the branch 14.0 to use github actions instead of travis. That will be done in separate PR, I will check how to do that.

ok

@AaronHForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

I mean to fix that here: #471 but I am not sure if I did well, I will wait for others to check.

"license": "LGPL-3",
"website": "https://github.com/OCA/operating-unit",
"category": "Sales Management",
"depends": ["sale", "account_operating_unit", "sales_team_operating_unit"],

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

change dependecy "sale" to "sale_management" since it's not installing the module

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Functional review installing the sales module manually is working ok

@AaronHForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

/ocabot rebase

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, PR rebased to 14.0.

@francesco-ooops
Copy link

@cramosh @AaronHForgeFlow same issue as described here

@AaronHForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

@cramosh I am sorry, but this PR should be closed in favor of #464, that was created before. Can you close it? You can reopen later on if needed.
@francesco-ooops Thanks for pointing that out.

@francesco-ooops
Copy link

@cramosh I am sorry, but this PR should be closed in favor of #464, that was created before. Can you close it? You can reopen later on if needed. @francesco-ooops Thanks for pointing that out.

I don't know if there are specific rules about this situation, but I think it's better to keep working on a PR where the dev is active rather than one that's been inactive for weeks, don't you think?

It is important that everyone involved is aware that there are two PRs, but the community's interest is just reaching the fastest merge, regardless of who opened first

(also @cramosh 's original pr was older, see #365 )

@cramosh
Copy link
Author

cramosh commented Apr 21, 2022

@cramosh I am sorry, but this PR should be closed in favor of #464, that was created before. Can you close it? You can reopen later on if needed. @francesco-ooops Thanks for pointing that out.

I don't know if there are specific rules about this situation, but I think it's better to keep working on a PR where the dev is active rather than one that's been inactive for weeks, don't you think?

It is important that everyone involved is aware that there are two PRs, but the community's interest is just reaching the fastest merge, regardless of who opened first

(also @cramosh 's original pr was older, see #365 )

Ok I will rectify the test and upload it again

@AaronHForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

@francesco-ooops it is ok to me to keep this open if @olveracuenca is not going to work on #464 anymore. I will ask in that PR.

@AaronHForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

It fails 2 things now:

pre-commit (just run pre-commit run -a)

I think you have to create a new product in the test, instead of using a reference. That way you will be able to change the type

@AaronHForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @cramosh , This PR is not abandoned #464 and it is green now. I think we should close this and continue on the other one. Sorry for that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.