-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 856
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[14.0][MIG] partner_contact_age_range: Migration to 14.0 #999
[14.0][MIG] partner_contact_age_range: Migration to 14.0 #999
Conversation
0957677
to
0143da7
Compare
fb2e8dd
to
84a5a5b
Compare
84a5a5b
to
29bbb42
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 LGTM code and functional review locally
Maybe adding a constraint for negative age_from
or age_to
validation would be nice, but not blocking.
Thank you for your migration
This PR has the |
/ocabot merge patch |
This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it! |
It looks like something changed on |
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 8695123. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
Standard Migration
depends on
Update test script, Ready for review.