[16.0] [MIG] product_state_history: Migration to 16.0 #1396
Conversation
michaelslade54
force-pushed
the
16.0-mig-product_state_history
branch
from
be05ef2 to
57bf679
Compare
|
/ocabot migration product_state_history |
|
@michaelslade54 Could you fix this as it seems you've included another module ? |
|
Apologies. It appears this commit 81a5eb6 in the commit history introduced some changes to the extra module, hence it appearing here. @rousseldenis I'm unsure of the most appropriate way to rectify this, is the preferred method to drop the commit and include any module specific changes in the migration? Any info appreciated. Thanks. |
|
@michaelslade54 The best solution is to rebase interactively and don't take modifications that are outside this module. |
Take into account product template status instead of history one when launching report
Wrong assertion for report as it should include products AFTER pivot date. Better view definition
To distinguish the report and the history (all the records), the action name has been changed
If the same state than the current is written, a duplicate state history is generated. This prevents that behaviour.
michaelslade54
force-pushed
the
16.0-mig-product_state_history
branch
from
57bf679 to
9e14da4
Compare
Signed-off-by: michaelslade <48970841+michaelslade54@users.noreply.github.com>
michaelslade54
force-pushed
the
16.0-mig-product_state_history
branch
from
9e14da4 to
49b4161
Compare
|
There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days. |
github-actions
bot
added
the
stale
Standard migration.