Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[16.0][ADD] base_user_effective_permissions #225

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024
Merged

[16.0][ADD] base_user_effective_permissions #225

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

hbrunn
Copy link
Member

@hbrunn hbrunn commented Jul 6, 2023

This module shows administrators a combined view of access rights and record rules per model with expressions expanded. This is convenient for reviewing permissions.

image

@hbrunn hbrunn changed the title [ADD] base_user_effective_permissions [16.0][ADD] base_user_effective_permissions Jul 6, 2023
@hbrunn hbrunn added this to the 16.0 milestone Jul 6, 2023
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2023

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Nov 5, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Dec 17, 2023
@thomaspaulb thomaspaulb reopened this Jun 7, 2024
@thomaspaulb
Copy link

/ocabot rebase

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, PR rebased to 16.0.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot force-pushed the 16.0-base_user_effective_permissions branch from b28e4c0 to 7b1891f Compare June 7, 2024 19:19
thomaspaulb
thomaspaulb approved these changes Jun 7, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@thomaspaulb thomaspaulb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice feature

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Jun 9, 2024
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Oct 13, 2024
@bosd
Copy link

bosd commented Oct 14, 2024

@hbrunn Can you please retrigger a runboat?

@thomaspaulb
Copy link

thomaspaulb commented Oct 14, 2024 via email

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, PR rebased to 16.0.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot force-pushed the 16.0-base_user_effective_permissions branch from 7b1891f to b1b76d7 Compare October 14, 2024 13:38
@bosd
Copy link

bosd commented Oct 14, 2024

You can do it with

Yeah, but sadly the stupid bot doesn't listen to me. One needs to be the author or maintainer.

Luckily the 🤖 listens to you.

bosd
bosd approved these changes Oct 15, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@bosd bosd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍 , Just some minor non-blocking questions/remarks.

base_user_effective_permissions/readme/USAGE.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
base_user_effective_permissions/i18n/.empty Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Oct 20, 2024
SiesslPhillip pushed a commit to grueneerde/OCA-server-backend that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
@bt-admin
Merge pull request OCA#225 from OCA/13.0
6648f6e 
Syncing from upstream OCA/server-backend (13.0)
@hbrunn hbrunn force-pushed the 16.0-base_user_effective_permissions branch 2 times, most recently from c18bda0 to e6cdb29 Compare November 21, 2024 10:11
@hbrunn hbrunn force-pushed the 16.0-base_user_effective_permissions branch from e6cdb29 to 87c329d Compare November 21, 2024 10:12
@hbrunn
Copy link
Member Author

hbrunn commented Nov 21, 2024

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-225-by-hbrunn-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit ca52433 into OCA:16.0 Nov 21, 2024
7 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 2bfda23. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bosd bosd bosd approved these changes

@thomaspaulb thomaspaulb thomaspaulb approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
approved merged 🎉 ready to merge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
16.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@hbrunn @thomaspaulb @OCA-git-bot @bosd