Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[17.0][MIG] base_search_custom_field_filter: Migration to 17.0 #851

Merged

Conversation

nguyenminhchien
Copy link

No description provided.

pedrobaeza and others added 30 commits April 4, 2024 15:01
…via UI

This module allows to define custom filters in the search views for an specific
field belonging to the document or any other related document.

This nature makes the definition quite technical, but once done, it adds the
element in the UI for regular user use.

Configuration
=============

* Go to *Settings > Technical > User Interface > Custom Field Filters*.
* Create a new record, and define following information:

  * The **Model** for which you are defining the filter. It will appear in all
    the search views of this model.
  * The label you want to see on the search line on the **Name** field. This
    field allows translations for proper UI in different languages.
  * The **Expression**, which is the field chain string with dot notation.
    Examples: `product_id`, `product_id.seller_ids.name`, `partner_id.lang`.
  * Optionally, you can fill **Position After** for indicating after which
    existing field (technical name) the filter will appear. If empty or not
    found, the filter will be added at the end.
* You can reorder records for determining sorting for multiple filters for the
  same model with the arrow handle in the left part.

Usage
=====

* Go to the menu entry for which you have defined the custom field filter.
* On the search bar, type anything.
* In the filter list, you will see the line for the element you have defined.

As demo data, a custom field filter is included for sample purposes.

Steps for trying this sample:

* Install `contacts` module.
* Go to *Contacts*.
* Type "english" and you'll find the filter "Language" at the end.
…h same field content

If the field you are looking for is a relational one, and contains the same value
in different records, when you unfold the results and select one of them, the results
of the search belongs to the first ocurrence instead the specific selected record.

This is due to Odoo JS code using same operator in this kind of search when filter_domain
is used in the filter. We avoid this letting the standard field code to act, but
injecting a custom attr that overwrites the left leaf of the domain.
Currently translated at 94.7% (18 of 19 strings)

Translation: server-ux-14.0/server-ux-14.0-base_search_custom_field_filter
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/server-ux-14-0/server-ux-14-0-base_search_custom_field_filter/es/
Currently translated at 100.0% (19 of 19 strings)

Translation: server-ux-14.0/server-ux-14.0-base_search_custom_field_filter
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/server-ux-14-0/server-ux-14-0-base_search_custom_field_filter/it/
…ression has related fields (dot notation).

TT38575
Currently translated at 100.0% (19 of 19 strings)

Translation: server-ux-16.0/server-ux-16.0-base_search_custom_field_filter
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/server-ux-16-0/server-ux-16-0-base_search_custom_field_filter/es/
Currently translated at 100.0% (19 of 19 strings)

Translation: server-ux-16.0/server-ux-16.0-base_search_custom_field_filter
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/server-ux-16-0/server-ux-16-0-base_search_custom_field_filter/it/
@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

/ocabot migration base_search_custom_field_filter

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added this to the 17.0 milestone Apr 8, 2024
@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot mentioned this pull request Apr 8, 2024
23 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@celm1990 celm1990 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 17.0-ocabot-merge-pr-851-by-pedrobaeza-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 5f3980a into OCA:17.0 Apr 26, 2024
5 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at a7710e2. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.