-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 720
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[MIG] stock_reserve 15.0 #1485
[MIG] stock_reserve 15.0 #1485
Conversation
6cba807
to
4655bd0
Compare
624efd4
to
303302a
Compare
303302a
to
daf80b8
Compare
Hey @flachica, thank you for your Pull Request. It looks like some users haven't signed our Contributor License Agreement, yet.
Appreciation of efforts, |
daf80b8
to
063ee5a
Compare
Thank you for your work. Maybe it would be a good idea to finish the migration to v14 (#1346) and then continue with this one. |
063ee5a
to
554f838
Compare
Sorry @victoralmau, this module is migrated in #1486. I got confused with branch |
/ocabot migration stock_reserve |
@flachica Could you remove unrelated files (stock_reserve_sale) ? |
@rousseldenis In this PR I got confused about the branch but I thought I had solved it. Please, can you tell me where you see the remaining files? I can not find it |
No, it's ok, wrong browser tab 😓 |
…will serve as a basis for the sale pre-book
don't use half the quantity so that the reserved qty is different from available qty
For weird reasons, force-assigning a move does not associate quants. action_assign'ing the picking does, and is the same procedure that you can do via the interface.
[UPG] Upgraded to version 8, fixed references to new 8.0 views and moved fields that were in product.product to product.template [fix] remove duplicate view and correct view name [UPG][FIX] added outgoing field XML, that was in the base stock field in 7.0. [UPG] stock available immediately, corrected the calculation method of immediately_usable_qty to take in accountthe sign change in outgoing_qty (from negative to positive) in version 8. [FLAKE8] [FIX] renaming of a class, comment removing, useless code. [UPD] move out from unported to 8 for update [fix] remove duplicate view and correct view name [UPG][FIX] added outgoing field XML, that was in the base stock field in 7.0. [FIX] renaming of a class, comment removing, useless code. [fix] remove duplicate view and correct view name [UPG][FIX] added outgoing field XML, that was in the base stock field in 7.0. [UPD] move out from unported to 8 for update [fix] remove duplicate view and correct view name [UPG][FIX] added outgoing field XML, that was in the base stock field in 7.0. [FIX] renaming of a class, comment removing, useless code. [UPD] move out from unported to 8 for update [fix] remove duplicate view and correct view name [UPG][FIX] added outgoing field XML, that was in the base stock field in 7.0. [FIX] renaming of a class, comment removing, useless code. [UPD] move out from unported to 8 for update [fix] remove duplicate view and correct view name [UPG][FIX] added outgoing field XML, that was in the base stock field in 7.0. [FIX] renaming of a class, comment removing, useless code. [fix] remove duplicate view and correct view name [UPG][FIX] added outgoing field XML, that was in the base stock field in 7.0. [UPD] move out from unported to 8 for update [fix] remove duplicate view and correct view name [UPG][FIX] added outgoing field XML, that was in the base stock field in 7.0. [FIX] renaming of a class, comment removing, useless code.
before running the tests. This fixes the failure experienced when running the test in --init mode rather than --update mode.
21fca09
to
53a1945
Compare
@victoralmau How I can set this commit as coauthored with you? You are made a lot of valueable suggestions |
53a1945
to
8c1ebc2
Compare
- Additionally include note field in stock reservation. It [was](odoo/odoo@71203e0) removed
8c1ebc2
to
2261a8b
Compare
You can use git cherry-pick to do so. Or oca-port tool https://pypi.org/project/oca-port/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review OK.
IMO, you don't need to add me as a co-author.
@rousseldenis Think this one should be ready to merge? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review
/ocabot merge patch |
On my way to merge this fine PR! |
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 531e272. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
No description provided.