Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ADD] product_customer_code_picking module v.7.0 #2

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
Oct 10, 2014

Conversation

tafaRU
Copy link
Member

@tafaRU tafaRU commented Jul 3, 2014

res[move.id] = ''
partner = move.picking_id.partner_id
if move.picking_id.partner_id.parent_id:
partner = move.picking_id.partner_id.parent_id

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi,

This section of code seems a little restrictive. Consider a 2 level deep partner. It would only take the direct parent. I could be wrong but it feels like what you might want here is a list of ids and use a ('partner_id', in, partner_ids) in your search.

Just a general comment, maybe there is a good reason for ignoring the current partner and any higher up partners.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some improvements about this at tafaRU#3

@lepistone
Copy link
Member

The 7.0 branch is now green, please rebase on 7.0 so that we can see if this branch is green as well.

Thanks!

@eLBati
Copy link
Member

eLBati commented Sep 19, 2014

On 09/19/2014 03:57 PM, Leonardo Pistone wrote:

ah wait @tafaRU https://github.com/tafaRU @eLBati
https://github.com/eLBati I don't see the travis build of the last
commits. Do you have any idea what happened?

Uhm, the branch is old and doesn't contain .travis.yml
@tafaRU please rebase

@bwrsandman
Copy link

Needs a rebase in order to be validated by Travis.

@tafaRU could you do this, or should someone copy this branch?

@tafaRU
Copy link
Member Author

tafaRU commented Oct 7, 2014

Rebasing I get a conflict on the file product_customer_code_picking/stock_picking_view.xml, a bit strange seeing that this branch adds a new module. So I prefer merging instead rebasing.

@tafaRU
Copy link
Member Author

tafaRU commented Oct 7, 2014

I think now the PR can be merged!

"description": """
Based on product_customer_code, this module loads in every stock picking
the customer code defined in the product.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested description improvement:

"This module makes the product customer code visible in the stock moves of a picking. "

@gurneyalex
Copy link
Member

@tafaRU if you're ok with it, could you apply the suggest description improvement above. I'll then merge the PR.

@tafaRU
Copy link
Member Author

tafaRU commented Oct 7, 2014

@gurneyalex just modified the description. Thanks.

@lepistone
Copy link
Member

It looks like all remarks have been addressed. Thanks to all!

lepistone added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2014
[ADD] product_customer_code_picking module v.7.0
@lepistone lepistone merged commit 8d37745 into OCA:7.0 Oct 10, 2014
@tafaRU tafaRU deleted the adding_product_customer_code_picking branch October 10, 2014 14:37
pedrobaeza pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2015
Use @api.multi for has_valuation_move() + fix log message
eLBati pushed a commit to eLBati/stock-logistics-workflow that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2015
…eparation_line_lb

remove mail thread dep
laetitia-gangloff pushed a commit to acsone/stock-logistics-workflow that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2015
stock_auto_move : replace utf8 by utf-8, use camelcase in class name
Garamotte pushed a commit to subteno-it/stock-logistics-workflow that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2015
mprove import/export of group_ids and user_ids
rousseldenis pushed a commit to acsone/stock-logistics-workflow that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2017
[10.0] [FIX] [stock_no_negative] proper indentation, docstring, flake8
zamberjo referenced this pull request in aurestic/stock-logistics-workflow Nov 15, 2019
Actualizacion rama 11
grindtildeath referenced this pull request in grindtildeath/stock-logistics-workflow Mar 23, 2020
# This is the 1st commit message:

Add module stock_quant_package_product_packaging

# The commit message #2 will be skipped:

# Add tests

# The commit message OCA#3 will be skipped:

# Display single_product fields in debug mode
lmignon pushed a commit to acsone/stock-logistics-workflow that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2020
# This is the 1st commit message:

Add module stock_quant_package_product_packaging

# The commit message OCA#2 will be skipped:

# Add tests

# The commit message OCA#3 will be skipped:

# Display single_product fields in debug mode
OCA-git-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2021
# This is the 1st commit message:

Add module stock_quant_package_product_packaging

# The commit message #2 will be skipped:

# Add tests

# The commit message #3 will be skipped:

# Display single_product fields in debug mode
dreispt pushed a commit to ursais/stock-logistics-workflow that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2022
flachica pushed a commit to flachica/stock-logistics-workflow that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2022
# This is the 1st commit message:

Add module stock_quant_package_product_packaging

# The commit message OCA#2 will be skipped:

# Add tests

# The commit message OCA#3 will be skipped:

# Display single_product fields in debug mode
rousseldenis pushed a commit to acsone/stock-logistics-workflow that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2022
# This is the 1st commit message:

Add module stock_quant_package_product_packaging

# The commit message OCA#2 will be skipped:

# Add tests

# The commit message OCA#3 will be skipped:

# Display single_product fields in debug mode
flachica pushed a commit to flachica/stock-logistics-workflow that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2022
# This is the 1st commit message:

Add module stock_quant_package_product_packaging

# The commit message OCA#2 will be skipped:

# Add tests

# The commit message OCA#3 will be skipped:

# Display single_product fields in debug mode
ferran-S73 pushed a commit to Studio73/stock-logistics-workflow that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2024
# This is the 1st commit message:

Add module stock_quant_package_product_packaging

# The commit message OCA#2 will be skipped:

# Add tests

# The commit message OCA#3 will be skipped:

# Display single_product fields in debug mode
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants