Skip to content

Issues: OCFL/spec

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

15 Open 290 Closed
15 Open 290 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Make examples in v2.0 spec validate without warnings Editorial Editorial issues (no changes to intent)
#661 opened Nov 12, 2024 by zimeon 2.0
Can we improve the Introduction / Need decription? Editorial Editorial issues (no changes to intent)
#650 opened Sep 14, 2024 by zimeon 2.0
2
Minor editorial suggestions from spec read through Editorial Editorial issues (no changes to intent)
#649 opened Sep 14, 2024 by zimeon 2.0
Review number of MAY's in spec Editorial Editorial issues (no changes to intent)
#639 opened Sep 22, 2023 by neilsjefferies 2.0
More references to the Implementation Notes in spec Editorial Editorial issues (no changes to intent)
#638 opened Sep 22, 2023 by neilsjefferies 2.0
1
Are Storage Roots optional? Storage Root
#620 opened Oct 10, 2022 by kieranjol 2.0
4
Add a section describing upgrading a Storage Root to a new spec version to the Implementation Notes Editorial Editorial issues (no changes to intent) Storage Root
#603 opened Jun 9, 2022 by zimeon 2.0
Add a section describing upgrading an object to a new spec version to the Implementation Notes Editorial Editorial issues (no changes to intent)
#602 opened Jun 9, 2022 by zimeon 2.0
Find way to have the 'table of contents' be in a side panel in the Markdown spec, so that it is always available. Editorial Editorial issues (no changes to intent)
#597 opened Jun 1, 2022 by zimeon 2.0
Should OCFL include a compatibility promise? Needs Discussion
#572 opened Jan 6, 2022 by srerickson 2.0
3
Handling mixed spec-version objects without version inventories Needs Discussion
#569 opened Dec 1, 2021 by zimeon 2.0
3
unicode normalization Needs Discussion
#559 opened Aug 20, 2021 by pwinckles 2.0
1
Is it OK to have a missing version directory? Needs Discussion
#540 opened Apr 20, 2021 by zimeon 2.0
@neilsjefferies
21
Should state how OCFL can work with Object Stores Implementation Notes Tickets to be included in implementation notes
#372 opened Sep 17, 2019 by neilsjefferies 2.0
3
Should there be a ZIP-per-version arrangement? OCFL Object
#182 opened Oct 2, 2018 by zimeon 2.0
4
ProTip! Follow long discussions with comments:>50.