Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove workflows #55

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 15, 2023
Merged

Remove workflows #55

merged 6 commits into from
May 15, 2023

Conversation

mweidling
Copy link
Contributor

This PR removes the whole workflow section from the back end since this is handled by quiver-benchmarks.

It also updates all relevant JSON files.

@mweidling mweidling self-assigned this May 9, 2023
@mweidling mweidling requested a review from kba May 9, 2023 10:59
@mweidling mweidling marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2023 10:59
Copy link
Member

@kba kba left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mweidling mweidling merged commit 0269ef5 into main May 15, 2023
@stweil
Copy link

stweil commented Jan 12, 2024

The QuiVer benchmarks still refer to the removed workflows.

Example workflows/results/reichsanzeiger_random_minimal_ocr_result.json:

{
    "eval_workflow_id": "wf-datareichsanzeiger_random-eval",
    "label": "Workflow on data reichsanzeiger_random",
    "metadata": {
        "ocr_workflow": {
            "@id": "https://github.com/OCR-D/quiver-back-end/blob/main/workflows/ocrd_workflows/minimal_ocr.txt",
            "label": "OCR Workflow minimal_ocr"
        },
        "eval_workflow": {
            "@id": "https://github.com/OCR-D/quiver-back-end/blob/main/workflows/ocrd_workflows/dinglehopper_eval.txt",
            "label": "Evaluation Workflow dinglehopper_eval"
        },
[...]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants