-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
adding ZMF keyword #4200
adding ZMF keyword #4200
Conversation
7a29150
to
d702e2d
Compare
11f5e07
to
928b7ac
Compare
jenkins build this opm-simulators=5625 please |
marking this as ready for review. |
jenkins build this opm-simulators=5625 please |
57a0273
to
6cd8c93
Compare
jenkins build this opm-simulators=5625 please |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not clear to me what we gain by the API change in phaseIsActive()
. Other than that, this looks good to me with the possible exception that the new comment in CompositionalTests.cpp
mostly speaks to those who are very familiar with implementation.
Thanks for the comments. I think I have addressed them. |
jenkins build this opm-simulators=5625 please |
Just a question on this aspect: Must the two PRs be merged together or can this be reviewed/merged independently and then the downstream one in a separate operation? |
I think this PR can go in first. |
jenkins build this please |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot for the updates. This looks good to me now.
I think this PR can go in first.
Much appreciated. In that case I'll merge this into the master branch.
The keyword ZMF is used to specify the mole fraction of a component per cell. It is a keyword for SOLUTION section.