-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spack package implementation with Ascent rebuild pipeline #10
Conversation
LGTM @pelesh and @ryandanehy I think this is ready |
I still didn't update docs like I said I would, so perhaps we just make another issue so I get back to that... this is basically the same as ExaGO scripts so I would just be re-typing what's mostly in there with a few modifications |
More documentation would be helpful, especially for Spack related issues, but I agree, we need a first stab at this in the main development branch. |
@ryandanehy feature or bug, the commit that's automated runs all testing again. We can change that by adding [ascent-test], but I would love to find a way to skip GitHub actions with different rules based on strings in commit messages, but am yet to bother. Especially applies with ExaGO and other repos where GitHub actions can be longer running builds. |
Need to make sure that Ascent rebuild can push to GitHub, and then this is good to go! See Spack PR here: spack/spack#40149