Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix get_nameid_unspecified and friends (refs #52) #55

Conversation

mjholtkamp
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like these methods are called with extra
arguments (e.g. sp_entityid), which are not used
in these specific methods.

Of course, Python complains if they are passed.
By allowing any kwargs, these are silently
ignored (as I believe they should, since they
are not relevant).

I only encountered the problem for
get_nameid_unspecified, but I noticed some other
methods that might have the same problem so I
changed them as well.

It looks like these methods are called with extra
arguments (e.g. sp_entityid), which are not used
in these specific methods.

Of course, Python complains if they are passed.
By allowing any kwargs, these are silently
ignored (as I believe they should, since they
are not relevant).

I only encountered the problem for 
get_nameid_unspecified, but I noticed some other
methods that might have the same problem so I
changed them as well.
@mjholtkamp mjholtkamp force-pushed the feature/bugfix-get_nameid_unspecified branch from 55d461e to d8df54c Compare February 3, 2020 14:07
@mhindery mhindery merged commit bd5d6a6 into OTA-Insight:master Feb 3, 2020
@mjholtkamp mjholtkamp deleted the feature/bugfix-get_nameid_unspecified branch February 4, 2020 08:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants