-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 680
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Clarification/For Discussion] Default credentials mean in 2.10.2 #764
Comments
My bad, this was assigned to me and I've stalled. Originally it was just as you said, for example, admin/admin123, and in hindsight, I can now see how this is actually not helpful in the way it was written. I'd really like to see how you'd make it better, so yeah please submit a PR |
If there are no more ideas, then alright will submit a PR later today. I think there's a way we could make this better. |
Suggestion to make 2.10.2 better. This Pull Request relates to issue OWASP#764 as per discussed.
@danielcuthbert, I analyzed it more about this requirement. It looks like this is about service authentication, though this ASVS requirement is still vague so I created a PR to make it better. Let me know your thoughts on it. |
thank you @csfreak92 ill check it this weekend! |
ASVS 4.0 - 2.10.2 verification requirement is:
Verify that if passwords are required, the credentials are not a default account.
I would like to clarify from the community/maintainers of this project regarding the term
default credentials
mean on this control? Doesdefault credentials
stand for some applications that have default credentials after installation? The way I interpreted this is if an application is deployed/installed and there are default credentials it fails this verification requirement (e.g. phpmyadmin application has "root", "admin" or something similar default credentials that comes with the installation of the application).If my assumption and thinking is correct, I'll create a Pull Request to link this issue, else please help me understand this control better. This confuses our team a lot of times.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: