Add Shared Responsibility Model to Secure Cloud Architecture #1178
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Content
This PR covers issue #1173. Added a section explaining the 3 main levels of the shared responsibility model, and made a small tweak to the self-managed tooling section to reflect the new section.
Review
One thing I would like a specific eye on is ensuring I have correctly explained/covered the nuances between the "as a Service" model and fully managed vs self-managed systems. There is significant overlap, but "as a Service" covers the differences from the developer and security responsibility set, and the levels of management refer to specific product groupings by cloud companies (ex: DynamoDB is "fully managed", but could be considered PaaS or SaaS).
Additionally, any suggestions for specific pros/cons in each section are welcome. It's hard to identify pros/cons in a provider agnostic manner.
@utilimatt Would you be willing to review this?
Thanks y'all!