Fix #1804: Added test for CardDetailsPage Component #1951
Conversation
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughA comprehensive unit test suite for the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~15 minutes Assessment against linked issues
Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changesNo out-of-scope changes found. Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx (4)
71-80: Simplify the getSocialIcon mock implementation.The current implementation has redundant type checking. Since the function already checks for truthy values and string type, you can simplify it.
jest.mock('utils/urlIconMappings', () => ({ getSocialIcon: (url: string) => ({ - iconName: - url && typeof url === 'string' && url.includes('github') - ? 'github' - : url && typeof url === 'string' && url.includes('twitter') - ? 'twitter' - : 'link', + iconName: url?.includes('github') + ? 'github' + : url?.includes('twitter') + ? 'twitter' + : 'link', }), }))
525-531: Consider moving jest.clearAllMocks() to afterEach for better test isolation.While the current setup works, it's a better practice to clear mocks after each test rather than before, ensuring complete cleanup even if a test fails.
beforeEach(() => { - jest.clearAllMocks() }) afterEach(() => { cleanup() + jest.clearAllMocks() })
770-779: Avoid type casting that might hide TypeScript errors.The type casting
as stringon lines 772-773 could mask actual TypeScript errors in the component. Consider using a more type-safe approach.const detailsWithMissingValues = [ { label: 'Missing Value', value: '' }, - { label: 'Null Value', value: null as string }, - { label: 'Undefined Value', value: undefined as string }, + { label: 'Null Value', value: null as any }, + { label: 'Undefined Value', value: undefined as any }, ]Alternatively, if the component's TypeScript types don't allow null/undefined values, this test might be highlighting a type safety issue that should be addressed in the component itself.
1064-1206: Consider using a type-safe approach for testing malformed data.While testing error handling with malformed data is important, the extensive use of type casting (e.g.,
as number,as unknown as string) throughout these tests might hide actual TypeScript errors. Consider creating properly typed test data or using a test utility function that explicitly handles these edge cases.Example approach:
// Create a test utility for malformed data const createMalformedData = <T>(validData: T, overrides: Partial<Record<keyof T, any>>): T => { return { ...validData, ...overrides } as T; }; // Usage: const malformedHealthData = [ createMalformedData(mockHealthMetricsData[0], { score: null }), ];This approach makes it clear that we're intentionally creating invalid data for testing purposes while maintaining better type safety in the test code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (6)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a safety check that ensures HealthMetrics component is only rendered when healthMetricsData exists and has at least one element: `healthMetricsData && healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This makes accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a length check before rendering HealthMetrics: `healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This ensures that when HealthMetrics is rendered, the data array has at least one element, making accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/src/app/mentorship/programs/[programKey]/edit/page.tsx:90-128
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:14:28.536Z
Learning: Both ProgramForm (programCard.tsx) and ModuleForm (mainmoduleCard.tsx) components already implement HTML validation using the `required` attribute on form fields. The browser's native validation prevents form submission and displays error messages when required fields are empty, eliminating the need for additional JavaScript validation before GraphQL mutations.
📚 Learning: when testing react page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be teste...
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the detailscard component (frontend/src/components/carddetailspage.tsx), there's a length check b...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a length check before rendering HealthMetrics: `healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This ensures that when HealthMetrics is rendered, the data array has at least one element, making accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the detailscard component (frontend/src/components/carddetailspage.tsx), there's a safety check t...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a safety check that ensures HealthMetrics component is only rendered when healthMetricsData exists and has at least one element: `healthMetricsData && healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This makes accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the owasp nest project's barchart component (frontend/src/components/barchart.tsx), the days and ...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1703
File: frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx:33-46
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T03:08:03.290Z
Learning: In the OWASP Nest project's BarChart component (frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx), the days and requirements arrays are guaranteed to always have the same length in their use cases, so input validation for array length matching is not needed.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx
📚 Learning: both programform (programcard.tsx) and moduleform (mainmodulecard.tsx) components already implement ...
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/src/app/mentorship/programs/[programKey]/edit/page.tsx:90-128
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:14:28.536Z
Learning: Both ProgramForm (programCard.tsx) and ModuleForm (mainmoduleCard.tsx) components already implement HTML validation using the `required` attribute on form fields. The browser's native validation prevents form submission and displays error messages when required fields are empty, eliminating the need for additional JavaScript validation before GraphQL mutations.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx (1)
1-1363: Excellent comprehensive test suite! 🎉This test suite thoroughly addresses the requirements from issue #1804 with 70 well-organized test cases covering:
- ✅ Essential rendering with minimal and full props
- ✅ Conditional rendering logic
- ✅ Event handling and callbacks
- ✅ Accessibility and semantic HTML
- ✅ Edge cases and error handling
- ✅ Performance considerations
- ✅ Responsive design
The tests are well-structured with clear describe blocks and descriptive test names. Great job on the comprehensive coverage!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx (5)
45-45: Simplify the conditional style assignmentThe ternary operator can be simplified since the style is only applied when
fillis true.Apply this diff to simplify the style assignment:
- style={fill ? { objectFit: objectFit as React.CSSProperties['objectFit'] } : undefined} + style={fill && { objectFit: objectFit as React.CSSProperties['objectFit'] }}
331-331: Avoid type assertion that could hide type errorsThe
as Ttype assertion bypasses TypeScript's type checking and could hide potential type mismatches.Consider using a more type-safe approach:
- return { ...validData, ...overrides } as T + return Object.assign({}, validData, overrides)Alternatively, ensure the overrides match the expected type structure to avoid runtime errors.
681-684: Refactor test loop for better readabilityThe forEach loop with cleanup() calls can be refactored using Jest's test.each for better readability and reporting.
Consider using test.each:
- supportedTypes.forEach((type) => { - cleanup() - render(<CardDetailsPage {...defaultProps} type={type} />) - expect(screen.getByText('Statistics')).toBeInTheDocument() - }) + test.each(supportedTypes)('renders statistics section for %s type', (type) => { + render(<CardDetailsPage {...defaultProps} type={type} />) + expect(screen.getByText('Statistics')).toBeInTheDocument() + })
819-821: Avoid deleting properties from spread objectsDeleting properties from spread objects can be confusing and may not work as expected with TypeScript.
Use object destructuring to exclude properties:
- const propsWithoutIsActive = { ...defaultProps } - delete propsWithoutIsActive.isActive + const { isActive, ...propsWithoutIsActive } = defaultProps
1089-1092: Extract createInvalidValues() call to reduce duplicationThe
createInvalidValues()function is called multiple times throughout the test file, creating identical objects each time.Consider creating a single instance at the module level:
+ const invalidValues = createInvalidValues() + describe('Data Validation and Error Handling', () => { it('handles malformed health metrics data gracefully', () => { - const invalidValues = createInvalidValues() const malformedHealthData = [This would improve performance and reduce redundancy across all test cases that use invalid values.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (6)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a safety check that ensures HealthMetrics component is only rendered when healthMetricsData exists and has at least one element: `healthMetricsData && healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This makes accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a length check before rendering HealthMetrics: `healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This ensures that when HealthMetrics is rendered, the data array has at least one element, making accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/src/app/mentorship/programs/[programKey]/edit/page.tsx:90-128
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:14:28.536Z
Learning: Both ProgramForm (programCard.tsx) and ModuleForm (mainmoduleCard.tsx) components already implement HTML validation using the `required` attribute on form fields. The browser's native validation prevents form submission and displays error messages when required fields are empty, eliminating the need for additional JavaScript validation before GraphQL mutations.
📚 Learning: when testing react page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be teste...
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the detailscard component (frontend/src/components/carddetailspage.tsx), there's a length check b...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a length check before rendering HealthMetrics: `healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This ensures that when HealthMetrics is rendered, the data array has at least one element, making accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the detailscard component (frontend/src/components/carddetailspage.tsx), there's a safety check t...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a safety check that ensures HealthMetrics component is only rendered when healthMetricsData exists and has at least one element: `healthMetricsData && healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This makes accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the owasp nest project's barchart component (frontend/src/components/barchart.tsx), the days and ...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1703
File: frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx:33-46
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T03:08:03.290Z
Learning: In the OWASP Nest project's BarChart component (frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx), the days and requirements arrays are guaranteed to always have the same length in their use cases, so input validation for array length matching is not needed.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx
📚 Learning: both programform (programcard.tsx) and moduleform (mainmodulecard.tsx) components already implement ...
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/src/app/mentorship/programs/[programKey]/edit/page.tsx:90-128
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:14:28.536Z
Learning: Both ProgramForm (programCard.tsx) and ModuleForm (mainmoduleCard.tsx) components already implement HTML validation using the `required` attribute on form fields. The browser's native validation prevents form submission and displays error messages when required fields are empty, eliminating the need for additional JavaScript validation before GraphQL mutations.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx (1)
326-1382: Excellent comprehensive test coverage! 🎉This test suite successfully achieves all the objectives outlined in the PR. The 70 test cases provide thorough coverage of:
- Component rendering with various prop combinations
- Conditional rendering logic based on entity types and data availability
- Event handling and user interactions
- Accessibility including semantic HTML and ARIA attributes
- Edge cases with invalid/malformed data
- Performance considerations
- Responsive design
The tests are well-organized, follow React Testing Library best practices, and align with the project's testing patterns (as noted in the retrieved learnings about focusing on page-level concerns rather than form validation).
kasya
left a comment
kasya
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wow! This one required a LOT of mocking! Well done @anurag2787!
kasya
left a comment
kasya
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@anurag2787 hi! I'm not sure what happened - I remember these tests were working fine just yesterday. But it seems that they are failing now, after main changes have been merged in. Could you check these and fix issues? Thanks!
It looks related to maxInitialDisplay change. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx (1)
748-1335: Comprehensive edge case and advanced testing coverage.Excellent work on covering edge cases, accessibility, performance, and complex integration scenarios. The malformed data testing and error handling validation are particularly valuable.
Consider whether some CSS class assertions (e.g., lines 861-868, 875, 882) test implementation details rather than user-facing behavior. While useful for regression prevention, they may make tests fragile to styling changes.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (6)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a safety check that ensures HealthMetrics component is only rendered when healthMetricsData exists and has at least one element: `healthMetricsData && healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This makes accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a length check before rendering HealthMetrics: `healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This ensures that when HealthMetrics is rendered, the data array has at least one element, making accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/src/app/mentorship/programs/[programKey]/edit/page.tsx:90-128
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:14:28.536Z
Learning: Both ProgramForm (programCard.tsx) and ModuleForm (mainmoduleCard.tsx) components already implement HTML validation using the `required` attribute on form fields. The browser's native validation prevents form submission and displays error messages when required fields are empty, eliminating the need for additional JavaScript validation before GraphQL mutations.
📚 Learning: when testing react page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be teste...
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the detailscard component (frontend/src/components/carddetailspage.tsx), there's a length check b...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a length check before rendering HealthMetrics: `healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This ensures that when HealthMetrics is rendered, the data array has at least one element, making accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the detailscard component (frontend/src/components/carddetailspage.tsx), there's a safety check t...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1633
File: frontend/src/components/HealthMetrics.tsx:30-30
Timestamp: 2025-06-20T16:12:59.256Z
Learning: In the DetailsCard component (frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx), there's a safety check that ensures HealthMetrics component is only rendered when healthMetricsData exists and has at least one element: `healthMetricsData && healthMetricsData.length > 0`. This makes accessing data[0] safe within the HealthMetrics component.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx
📚 Learning: in the owasp nest project's barchart component (frontend/src/components/barchart.tsx), the days and ...
Learnt from: ahmedxgouda
PR: OWASP/Nest#1703
File: frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx:33-46
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T03:08:03.290Z
Learning: In the OWASP Nest project's BarChart component (frontend/src/components/BarChart.tsx), the days and requirements arrays are guaranteed to always have the same length in their use cases, so input validation for array length matching is not needed.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx
📚 Learning: both programform (programcard.tsx) and moduleform (mainmodulecard.tsx) components already implement ...
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/src/app/mentorship/programs/[programKey]/edit/page.tsx:90-128
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:14:28.536Z
Learning: Both ProgramForm (programCard.tsx) and ModuleForm (mainmoduleCard.tsx) components already implement HTML validation using the `required` attribute on form fields. The browser's native validation prevents form submission and displays error messages when required fields are empty, eliminating the need for additional JavaScript validation before GraphQL mutations.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (6)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/CardDetailsPage.test.tsx (6)
8-338: Excellent mock setup with comprehensive component coverage.The mock implementations are well-structured and preserve component interfaces while providing controllable test doubles. The TypeScript typing in mocks ensures type safety during testing.
The comment on line 246 about
maxInitialDisplaybeing unused aligns with the PR feedback about recent upstream changes affecting tests. This might be related to the failing tests mentioned in the comments.
340-564: Well-structured test data and helper functions.The mock data objects are comprehensive and realistic, covering various component scenarios. The helper functions like
createMalformedDataandcreateInvalidValuesare excellent for systematic edge case testing and error handling validation.
571-596: Solid foundation with essential rendering tests.These tests properly verify both minimal and full rendering scenarios, ensuring the component is resilient and can handle various prop configurations.
598-747: Thorough conditional rendering and behavior testing.Excellent coverage of the component's conditional logic across different entity types. The tests properly verify both what should render and what shouldn't render based on different props, which is crucial for this type of dynamic component.
1336-1379: Excellent accessibility edge case coverage.These tests demonstrate strong attention to real-world accessibility scenarios, including handling of very long text content and special characters. This type of testing is often overlooked but crucial for robust components.
1-1379: Outstanding comprehensive test suite that fully addresses issue #1804 requirements.This test suite excellently covers all 10 objectives from the linked issue:
- ✅ Rendering with minimal and full props
- ✅ Conditional rendering logic verification
- ✅ Prop-based behavior testing
- ✅ Event handling and user interaction simulation
- ✅ Internal state and component logic testing
- ✅ Default values and fallback validation
- ✅ Text and content rendering verification
- ✅ Edge cases and invalid input handling
- ✅ Accessibility roles and labels confirmation
- ✅ DOM structure and styling inspection
The 83 test cases provide thorough coverage with excellent organization and testing best practices. The mock setup is comprehensive and the test data helpers enable systematic edge case testing.
Note: The test failures mentioned in PR comments may be related to the
maxInitialDisplayparameter change (line 246 comment), which appears to be an upstream issue rather than a problem with this test implementation.
Yes! Jest mocks were spreading maxInitialDisplay due to this it casuing prop validation error |
|
arkid15r
left a comment
arkid15r
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
~1.5k lines of code for tests is a big deal, thanks for adding that 👍
* Added test for CardDetailsPage Components * fixed coderabbitai review * fixed coderabbitai ationable comments * Used object spread instead of Object.assign * prevent react DOM prop validation error --------- Co-authored-by: Kate Golovanova <kate@kgthreads.com>
3 participants
Resolves #1804
Description
Added Unit Tests for CardDetailsPage Component
Added comprehensive test suite with 83 test cases covering:
Checklist
make check-testlocally; all checks and tests passed.