Test/recent pull request #2011
Test/recent pull request #2011
Conversation
This reverts commit bcce155.
- Add complete test suite covering all 10 testing criteria - Include rendering, conditional logic, prop behavior tests - Add event handling and accessibility tests - Cover edge cases and DOM structure validation - Implement proper mocking for dependencies - Organize tests with clear section headers for maintainability
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughA new unit test suite was introduced for the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Possibly related issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Note 🔌 MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available in Early Access!Pro users can now connect to remote MCP servers under the Integrations page to get reviews and chat conversations that understand additional development context. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentPullRequests.test.tsx (3)
96-99: Consider strengthening the showAvatar prop test.The current test only verifies that the component renders when
showAvatar={false}is passed, but doesn't actually test that the prop affects avatar display behavior. Consider testing the actual difference in rendered output when this prop changes.- it('passes showAvatar prop to ItemCardList', () => { - render(<RecentPullRequests data={minimalData} showAvatar={false} />) - expect(screen.getByText('test-repo')).toBeInTheDocument() - }) + it('passes showAvatar prop to ItemCardList', () => { + // Test with showAvatar=true (default) + const { rerender } = render(<RecentPullRequests data={minimalData} />) + // Add assertion for avatar presence if testable + + // Test with showAvatar=false + rerender(<RecentPullRequests data={minimalData} showAvatar={false} />) + // Add assertion for avatar absence if testable + expect(screen.getByText('test-repo')).toBeInTheDocument() + })
121-124: Consider removing redundant default value test.This test appears to duplicate the basic rendering test and doesn't actually verify that the default value for
showAvataris being used correctly. The assertion only checks that content renders, not the default behavior.- // --- Defaults and Fallbacks --- - it('uses default value for showAvatar when not provided', () => { - render(<RecentPullRequests data={minimalData} />) - expect(screen.getByText('test-repo')).toBeInTheDocument() - })
127-132: Consider consolidating redundant content rendering test.This test duplicates assertions already covered in the basic rendering test (lines 81-87). Consider removing it to avoid test redundancy.
- // --- Content Rendering --- - it('renders the title and formatted date', () => { - render(<RecentPullRequests data={minimalData} />) - expect(screen.getByText('Recent Pull Requests')).toBeInTheDocument() - expect(screen.getByText('Jun 1, 2024')).toBeInTheDocument() - expect(screen.getByText('Test Pull Request')).toBeInTheDocument() - })
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentPullRequests.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: adithya-naik
PR: OWASP/Nest#1894
File: frontend/src/components/TopContributorsList.tsx:74-74
Timestamp: 2025-07-28T14:51:14.736Z
Learning: In the OWASP/Nest project, the maintainer adithya-naik prefers not to create separate components for code that's only used in two specific cases, following the YAGNI principle to avoid over-engineering when the duplication is limited and manageable.
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
📚 Learning: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learnt from: Rajgupta36
PR: OWASP/Nest#1717
File: frontend/__tests__/unit/pages/createProgram.test.tsx:70-86
Timestamp: 2025-07-12T17:36:57.255Z
Learning: When testing React page components that use mocked form components, validation logic should be tested at the form component level, not the page level. Page-level tests should focus on authentication, role checking, submission handling, and navigation logic.
Applied to files:
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentPullRequests.test.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (10)
frontend/__tests__/unit/components/RecentPullRequests.test.tsx (10)
1-4: LGTM! Clean and appropriate imports.The imports are well-organized with proper testing library utilities, TypeScript types, and the component under test.
9-26: Well-structured mocks for isolated testing.The mocks appropriately isolate the component under test by providing predictable implementations of external dependencies. The fixed date format and router push mock enable consistent and testable behavior.
32-69: Comprehensive test data covering normal and edge cases.The test data is well-structured with a complete User object and pull request data that covers both typical usage (
minimalData) and edge cases (noRepoDatawith undefined repositoryName).
75-78: Proper test suite setup with mock cleanup.Good practice to clear all mocks after each test to ensure test isolation.
81-87: Solid basic rendering test.The test effectively verifies that all essential elements are rendered correctly with minimal required props.
90-93: Good conditional rendering test.Properly tests the edge case where repositoryName is undefined and verifies the repository button is not rendered.
102-106: Excellent event handling test.The test properly simulates user interaction and verifies the correct router navigation behavior with the expected URL format.
109-118: Good edge case coverage.These tests properly handle boundary conditions with empty and undefined data, ensuring the component is robust.
135-139: Important accessibility testing.Good coverage of accessibility features with role-based queries and button element verification. This helps ensure the component is usable with assistive technologies.
142-145: Useful DOM structure validation.Testing CSS classes helps catch styling regressions and ensures the expected layout structure is maintained.
- Update tests to check behavior of showAvatar prop with assertions for avatar presence and absence - Remove redundant tests for default prop values and content rendering - Improve test organization for clarity and maintainability
|
@arkid15r build the test. waiting for your review . |
|
@arkid15r sir PR raised , waiting for the review |
|
@arkid15r please review this one too |
yes, perhaps later today -- sorry for the delay |
|
3 participants
Proposed change
Resolves #(1883)
completed with the test for RecentPullRequests component
Renders successfully with minimal required props
[y] Conditional rendering logic
[y] Prop-based behavior
[y] Event handling
[y] State changes/internal logic
[y] Default values and fallbacks
[y] Text and content rendering
[y] Edge cases and invalid inputs
[y] Accessibility roles and labels
[y] DOM structure/classNames/styles
Checklist
make check-testlocally; all checks and tests passed.