Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
fix spelling
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
sydseter committed Feb 3, 2025
1 parent 16b52a9 commit 5c87a72
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion data/cards/webapp-cards-1.22-en/data.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ let data = {
},
{
"value": "T01990",
"text": "Another suggestion is that if a player fails to identify the card is relevant, allow other players to suggest ideas, and potentially let them gain the point for the card. "
"text": "Another suggestion is that if a player fails to identify the card as relevant, allow other players to suggest ideas, and potentially let them gain the point for the card. "
},
{
"value": "T02000",
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion data/mock/cards.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ paragraphs:
text: "Some teams have preferred to play a full hand of cards, and then discuss what is on the cards after each round (instead of after each person plays a card)."
-
value: "T01990"
text: "Another suggestion is that if a player fails to identify the card is relevant, allow other players to suggest ideas, and potentially let them gain the point for the card. "
text: "Another suggestion is that if a player fails to identify the card as relevant, allow other players to suggest ideas, and potentially let them gain the point for the card. "
-
value: "T02000"
text: "Consider allowing extra points for especially good contributions."
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion data/website/pages/play/en/index.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -46,6 +46,6 @@ See Márk Vinkovits leading a threat modelling <a rel="noopener" href="https://w
- Practice on an imaginary application, or even a future planned application, rather than trying to find fault with existing applications until the participants are happy with the usefulness of the game.
- Consider just playing with one suit to make a shorter session – but try to cover all the suits for every project. Or even better just play one hand with some pre-selected cards, and score only on the ability to identify security requirements. Perhaps have one game of each suit each day for a week or so, if the participants cannot spare long enough for a full deck.
- Some teams have preferred to play a full hand of cards and then discuss what is on the cards after each round (instead of after each person plays a card).
- Another suggestion is that if a player fails to identify the card is relevant, allow other players to suggest ideas, and potentially let them gain the point for the card. Consider allowing extra points for especially good contributions.
- Another suggestion is that if a player fails to identify the card as relevant, allow other players to suggest ideas, and potentially let them gain the point for the card. Consider allowing extra points for especially good contributions.
- You can even play by yourself. Just use the cards to act as thought-provokers. Involving more people will be beneficial though.
- In Microsoft's EoP guidance, they recommend cheating as a good game strategy.

0 comments on commit 5c87a72

Please sign in to comment.