Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Timeboost gentle intro #1749

Open
wants to merge 21 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Timeboost gentle intro #1749

wants to merge 21 commits into from

Conversation

anegg0
Copy link
Contributor

@anegg0 anegg0 commented Oct 14, 2024

No description provided.

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the s label Oct 14, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 14, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
arbitrum-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 25, 2024 6:36pm

Copy link
Contributor

@TucksonDev TucksonDev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Preliminary review

@leeederek
Copy link
Member

I just pushed a new commit that reformats many of the sections, adds look-ups for many new glossary terms, addresses all of @TucksonDev's feedback, and puts the parameters into a nice table.

Also looks like if i build this locally, i have to manually navigate to http://localhost:3000/how-arbitrum-works/timeboost/gentle-introduction to get to this page (i.e. its not accessible from the docs website).

Can we align on a specific spot in the docs for Timeboost to live? Thank you!

@anegg0 anegg0 marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2024 20:13
@anegg0 anegg0 marked this pull request as draft October 23, 2024 20:14
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Nov 26, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants