[User Model] Make ktlint fixes

[brismithers]

Description

One Line Summary

Update source to be compliant with ktlint

Details

Motivation

Run ktlint -F to autofix what it can. Manually fix any remaining issues. No functional code changes should have been made, just formatting.

Testing

Manual testing

No testing was performed.

Affected code checklist

• Notifications
  • Display
  • Open
  • Push Processing
  • Confirm Deliveries
• Outcomes
• Sessions
• In-App Messaging
• REST API requests
• Public API changes

Checklist

Overview

• I have filled out all REQUIRED sections above
• PR does one thing
  • If it is hard to explain how any codes changes are related to each other then it most likely needs to be more than one PR
• Any Public API changes are explained in the PR details and conform to existing APIs

Testing

• I have included test coverage for these changes, or explained why they are not needed
• All automated tests pass, or I explained why that is not possible
• I have personally tested this on my device, or explained why that is not possible

Final pass

• Code is as readable as possible.
  • Simplify with less code, followed by splitting up code into well named functions and variables, followed by adding comments to the code.
• I have reviewed this PR myself, ensuring it meets each checklist item
  • WIP (Work In Progress) is ok, but explain what is still in progress and what you would like feedback on. Start the PR title with "WIP" to indicate this.

---

This change is 

[jkasten2]

Looks like there is still a failure with the CI:

> Task :OneSignal:core:ktlintMainSourceSetCheck FAILED
/home/runner/work/OneSignal-Android-SDK/OneSignal-Android-SDK/OneSignalSDK/onesignal/core/src/main/java/com/onesignal/session/internal/outcomes/impl/OutcomeEventsRepository.kt:325:1 Unexpected indentation (20) (should be 16)

[brismithers]

thanks @jkasten2, discovering how the defaults change across ktlint versions! I've updated our repo to the newest ktlint plugin and ktlint, pinning to that version. Linting has now passed, unit testing fails but that will be addressed via #1749