-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: update readme content #213
Conversation
{ | ||
"address": "0xe59877ac86c0310e9ddaeb627f42fdee5f793fbe", | ||
"minted": true | ||
{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to make sure, is this really a valid document that works on ropsten? If that's the case can add that sentence just above? (below you will find a valid document issued on ropsten, etc.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes it is valid and issued on ropsten. Ok I have included the one liner right at the top of it.
README.md
Outdated
import { getData } from "@govtechsg/open-attestation"; | ||
import * as document from "./document.json"; | ||
|
||
const customVerifier = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
missing Verifier type
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, have added the Verifier type
d5ed179
to
3446030
Compare
🎉 This PR is included in version 7.8.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
No description provided.