You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We seem to conclude that having a process reduce_spatial(raster-cube, process, context) -> raster-cube is the way to go. [...]
One thing that came to mind is that for aggregate_spatial and reduce_dimension we have the binary variants (e.g. reduce_dimension_binary). We'd need a binary variant also for reduce_spatial, but on the other hand, I'm wondering whether we should remove these binary variants for now? There's no implementation yet and I've also not heard that anyone is actually planning to implement one of them.
We seem to conclude that having a process
reduce_spatial(raster-cube, process, context) -> raster-cube
is the way to go. [...]One thing that came to mind is that for aggregate_spatial and reduce_dimension we have the binary variants (e.g.
reduce_dimension_binary
). We'd need a binary variant also for reduce_spatial, but on the other hand, I'm wondering whether we should remove these binary variants for now? There's no implementation yet and I've also not heard that anyone is actually planning to implement one of them.Originally posted by @m-mohr in #226 (comment)
They were experimental before, so we can easily remove them without breaking change.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: