Code Coverage

[luqmanbello]

• Implement code coverage

[Chavithra]

Hi @luqmanbello,

fixed the tests.

I think we should combine "coverage" CI and tests CI.

Or something like this to avoid running the tests twice.

Thanks

[Chavithra]

Looks ok to me.

[luqmanbello]

Hi @luqmanbello,

fixed the tests.

I think we should combine "coverage" CI and tests CI.

Or something like this to avoid running the tests twice.

Thanks

Since we are not enforcing it yet, we can combine it with the unit test

[jmaslek]

Should we have the code cov depend on the check for changes so that the tests arent running when no .py files are changed?

[luqmanbello]

Should we have the code cov depend on the check for changes so that the tests arent running when no .py files are changed?

That's what I just implemented. it will also only run on the base-test