Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add reverse fx choices to forex load #4333

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 26, 2023
Merged

Add reverse fx choices to forex load #4333

merged 4 commits into from
Feb 26, 2023

Conversation

montezdesousa
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Fixes #4095

  • Summary of the change / bug fix.
  • Link # issue, if applicable.
  • Screenshot of the feature or the bug before/after fix, if applicable.
  • Relevant motivation and context.
  • List any dependencies that are required for this change.

How has this been tested?

  • Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes.
  • Provide instructions so we can reproduce.
  • Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration.
  • Make sure affected commands still run in terminal
  • Ensure the SDK still works
  • Check any related reports

Checklist:

Others

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.

@montezdesousa montezdesousa added the bug Fix bug label Feb 25, 2023
@reviewpad reviewpad bot added the feat XS Extra small feature label Feb 25, 2023
@jmaslek jmaslek enabled auto-merge February 26, 2023 20:08
@jmaslek jmaslek added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 26, 2023
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 0d5fa09 Feb 26, 2023
@colin99d colin99d deleted the hotfix/4095 branch February 27, 2023 18:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Fix bug feat XS Extra small feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Forex/Load - Loading a pair fails because choices are not defined in both directions.
2 participants