-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: update dataset & readme docs #104
Merged
jackapbutler
merged 5 commits into
OpenBioML:main
from
jackapbutler:update-dataset-docs
Mar 17, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b29fb57
remove duplicate install notes
jackapbutler 83d40bb
docs: add note about multiple splits
jackapbutler cee4fd3
add note about HF hub
jackapbutler c2406b0
docs: add precommit to install guidelines
jackapbutler e2a7621
update with link
jackapbutler File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess this is one way - but I think we handled it differently now in different datasets by adding a
split_col
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that PR handles the case where datasets have been included in a larger benchmark but my dataset splits are more related to the fact that the dataset itself has natural splits of train, test, validation based on its' usage alone in other papers?
If we are specifying the benchmark split in #98 we might also want to add in which benchmark the dataset is a part of so we can remove it from benchmarking? Although there'll be some duplicate information I can't see us handling both cases with the
split_col
.TLDR
split_col
in chore: run pre-commit in CI, rework datasets #98 indicates the benchmarking split if your dataset is part of a benchmark (but we also don't know the benchmark?)<split>_meta.yaml
in docs: update dataset & readme docs #104 indicates a split in the dataset and handles the case where the dataset alone was used in other papers and we want to maintain that original train,test split.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I don't think that they are the same thing. The thing we're perhaps missing at the moment is recording the benchmark in which the dataset has been used. Perhaps my use of "benchmark" has been confusing as many of our tabular datasets so far are part of MoleculeNet or TDC, which are kind of "benchmarks" with leaderboards, but we didn't decide yet if we will also use them to benchmark the models ChemNLP produces (because then we would probably also need to drop the molecules that are in the test in one of the benchmarks from all other training datasets.)
The datasets revised in #98 are all part of TDC, which has been used in papers (hopefully with the train/val/test splits the TDC indicated).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes agreed, so maybe changing
split_col
tobenchmark_split
and then adding abenchmark_name
field could work?