[RFC - FCP]: Reorganize Device Path Libraries

[berlin-with0ut-return]

Description

See RFC for more details. Addresses #1148 by consolidating and reorganizing Device Path functionality.

• Impacts functionality?
• Impacts security?
• Breaking change?
• Includes tests?
• Includes documentation?

How This Was Tested

N/A.

Integration Instructions

N/A.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR adds an RFC describing a plan to consolidate and reorganize all Device Path Protocol functionality into a unified device_path module within the Patina SDK. It focuses on clarifying where Device Path types and parsing logic should live and proposes improved node-construction patterns to centralize header initialization.

Changes:

• Introduces RFC 0024 outlining consolidation of Device Path structs and parsing into sdk/patina::device_path.
• Documents current fragmentation of Device Path-related crates and the intended dependency direction (e.g., replacing patina_internal_device_path usage with the SDK).
• Provides a high-level Rust code design, including example module layout and a more ergonomic MediaFwVolDevicePath constructor pattern.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 84.65409% with 244 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
components/patina_acpi/src/acpi.rs	94.07%	48 Missing ⚠️
components/patina_acpi/src/acpi_protocol.rs	55.06%	40 Missing ⚠️
components/patina_acpi/src/signature.rs	13.33%	26 Missing ⚠️
components/patina_acpi/src/error.rs	21.88%	25 Missing ⚠️
components/patina_acpi/src/service.rs	17.86%	23 Missing ⚠️
components/patina_acpi/src/acpi_table.rs	90.56%	22 Missing ⚠️
components/patina_adv_logger/src/logger.rs	62.50%	15 Missing ⚠️
components/patina_adv_logger/src/memory_log.rs	90.80%	15 Missing ⚠️
components/patina_acpi/src/component.rs	0.00%	9 Missing ⚠️
patina_dxe_core/src/gcd/spin_locked_gcd.rs	81.63%	9 Missing ⚠️
... and 4 more

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[makubacki]

@berlin-with0ut-return, can you please specify the RFC state in the PR description? Right now, it should be "draft" since it hasn't gone to "FCP" yet.

[makubacki]

The proposal to move device path related content under a single module in the patina sdk crate sounds good. If you run into any conflicts or opens arise while merging the content, it'd be good to discuss further here.