-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 537
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JVM crash on Raspberry Pi 3 #253
Comments
It would be useful to see if the core, bytes, and wire libraries crash or
|
Hi!
|
Thank for you responses I'm getting the same problem on bytes (not in core but I guess atomic_store_long is never called). Thanks franz1981 for your answer, I'm a bit disappointed, I don't really like to recompile a kernel :) |
We can a different Memory implementation which only performs aligned On 12 May 2016 at 12:49, Gabriel Landais notifications@github.com wrote:
|
The kernel message :
The output of
So I tried
But it still fails...
|
@peter-lawrey @glandais /* there are a lot of possibilities:
Anyway, here: |
I have changed the alignment for atomic long operations for queue in the Peter. On 12 May 2016 at 13:57, franz1981 notifications@github.com wrote:
|
Maybe VM.isDirectMemoryPageAligned() ? |
AFAIK yes:
Unsafe is the only way to be perform any-type-misaligned ops on the JDK: Bits.putXXX/getXXX implements the XXX put/get with single byte ops (every adress is byte-aligned). |
For now the next version will always align 8 byte atomic values. We can
|
Some changes have been made to enforce alignment for these 8-byte updates. |
Yes! |
|
I was worried that might be the case. The 8 byte values are aligned but 4 On 28 June 2016 at 09:45, Gabriel Landais notifications@github.com wrote:
|
Using provided Oracle JDK on my new π
Cloned using
Output :
The report : hs_err_pid6450.zip
May be an issue with the JVM...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: