Add MIT LICENSE

[asadm]

Before we began, we should decide on a license. If this is "open", I would consider MIT or Apache 2.0 to be safe choices.

[jjfantini]

what about an open license that restricts commercial use? to keep it for the people?

[pombredanne]

what about an open license that restricts commercial use? to keep it for the people?

Then this is proprietary, not open source.

[asadm]

If we go with a non-commercial license:

• many will not contribute at all, since it's not open source in true sense
• commercial folks will just reimplement ideas here, LoC vs. impact is pretty low in genAI world, will take a weekend to replicate ideas
• this repo will be left behind.

[hannibalhuang]

agree with @asadm here and also just commented on issue #10 , MIT or Apache 2.0 are safer choices than CC-bys

[huybery]

Thank you @asadm , more people think the MIT license is a better fit for OpenDevin.