Skip to content

Comments

test(integration): adjust t10 restore matrix run#1608

Draft
enyst wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
openhands/integration-tests-only
Draft

test(integration): adjust t10 restore matrix run#1608
enyst wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
openhands/integration-tests-only

Conversation

@enyst
Copy link
Collaborator

@enyst enyst commented Jan 6, 2026

This PR splits out the integration-test-only changes that were included in #1542.

Changes included:

  • .github/workflows/integration-runner.yml: runs t10_restore_conversation once (restore config selected from the matrix)
  • tests/integration/run_infer.py: only skips t10_restore_conversation when running in integration mode; reads restore config from the matrix
  • tests/integration/tests/t10_restore_conversation.py: adds/updates the restore behavior test

Goal: keep #1542 focused on the reconciliation removal, while we iterate on integration test behavior without needing to run the full LLM matrix.

@enyst can click here to continue refining the PR


Agent Server images for this PR

GHCR package: https://github.com/OpenHands/agent-sdk/pkgs/container/agent-server

Variants & Base Images

Variant Architectures Base Image Docs / Tags
java amd64, arm64 eclipse-temurin:17-jdk Link
python amd64, arm64 nikolaik/python-nodejs:python3.12-nodejs22 Link
golang amd64, arm64 golang:1.21-bookworm Link

Pull (multi-arch manifest)

# Each variant is a multi-arch manifest supporting both amd64 and arm64
docker pull ghcr.io/openhands/agent-server:0c49e4a-python

Run

docker run -it --rm \
  -p 8000:8000 \
  --name agent-server-0c49e4a-python \
  ghcr.io/openhands/agent-server:0c49e4a-python

All tags pushed for this build

ghcr.io/openhands/agent-server:0c49e4a-golang-amd64
ghcr.io/openhands/agent-server:0c49e4a-golang_tag_1.21-bookworm-amd64
ghcr.io/openhands/agent-server:0c49e4a-golang-arm64
ghcr.io/openhands/agent-server:0c49e4a-golang_tag_1.21-bookworm-arm64
ghcr.io/openhands/agent-server:0c49e4a-java-amd64
ghcr.io/openhands/agent-server:0c49e4a-eclipse-temurin_tag_17-jdk-amd64
ghcr.io/openhands/agent-server:0c49e4a-java-arm64
ghcr.io/openhands/agent-server:0c49e4a-eclipse-temurin_tag_17-jdk-arm64
ghcr.io/openhands/agent-server:0c49e4a-python-amd64
ghcr.io/openhands/agent-server:0c49e4a-nikolaik_s_python-nodejs_tag_python3.12-nodejs22-amd64
ghcr.io/openhands/agent-server:0c49e4a-python-arm64
ghcr.io/openhands/agent-server:0c49e4a-nikolaik_s_python-nodejs_tag_python3.12-nodejs22-arm64
ghcr.io/openhands/agent-server:0c49e4a-golang
ghcr.io/openhands/agent-server:0c49e4a-java
ghcr.io/openhands/agent-server:0c49e4a-python

About Multi-Architecture Support

  • Each variant tag (e.g., 0c49e4a-python) is a multi-arch manifest supporting both amd64 and arm64
  • Docker automatically pulls the correct architecture for your platform
  • Individual architecture tags (e.g., 0c49e4a-python-amd64) are also available if needed

Base automatically changed from openhands/remove-reconciliation-methods to main January 6, 2026 15:58
@all-hands-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[Automatic Post]: It has been a while since there was any activity on this PR. @enyst, are you still working on it? If so, please go ahead, if not then please request review, close it, or request that someone else follow up.

1 similar comment
@all-hands-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[Automatic Post]: It has been a while since there was any activity on this PR. @enyst, are you still working on it? If so, please go ahead, if not then please request review, close it, or request that someone else follow up.

@enyst enyst added behavior-initiative This is related to the system prompt sections and LLM steering. and removed behavior-initiative This is related to the system prompt sections and LLM steering. labels Feb 14, 2026
@all-hands-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[Automatic Post]: It has been a while since there was any activity on this PR. @enyst, are you still working on it? If so, please go ahead, if not then please request review, close it, or request that someone else follow up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants