Parameter Sizing Bugfix

[kaushikponnapalli]

Summary

When parameters were added at the trajectory level, some options were not passed down to the phases. Fixed to include all parameter options when adding the parameters in the trajectory

Related Issues

• Resolves Adding a non-scalar parameter to a trajectory raises an error if we size it with "shape", but works successfully with "val". #769

Backwards incompatibilities

None

New Dependencies

None

[Kenneth-T-Moore]

That would definitely explain what was happening. I would recommend adding a test where we set "shape" instead of "val". You can probably copy an existing test for it.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.04%) to 95.521% when pulling 61fcd8f on kaushikponnapalli:param_sizing_bugfix into dee3a95 on OpenMDAO:master.