-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implicit duration #939
Implicit duration #939
Conversation
…fore setup and configure
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is looking pretty good. We'll need an example in the docs before this is merged. The balanced field length problem is an interesting problem where each phase can be ended via a triggering condition and so it might make an interesting test case for this. We would just need to make an assumption on alpha during the climb portion (it can't be a design variable if we're just propagating)
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
docs/dymos_book/examples/cannonball_implicit_duration/cannonball_implicit_duration.ipynb
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@@ -0,0 +1,471 @@ | |||
{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The bit about setting up two phases and linking them accordingly needs to be changed.
Reply via ReviewNB
Summary
Allows users to define a non-time stopping condition for a phase using
phase.add_duration_balance()
Related Issues
Backwards incompatibilities
None
New Dependencies
None