-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: update gha workflows #25
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to various GitHub Actions workflows, including renaming workflows for clarity, modifying trigger conditions, and altering job configurations to reference a new repository. Parameters have been added or adjusted across several workflows to enhance functionality. Additionally, metadata in a skill configuration file has been updated to reflect new ownership and repository information. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Developer
participant GitHub
participant Workflow
participant Repository
Developer->>GitHub: Push changes
GitHub->>Workflow: Trigger workflow
Workflow->>Repository: Run tests and updates
Repository-->>Workflow: Return results
Workflow->>GitHub: Update status
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- .github/workflows/license_tests.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/propose_release.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/publish_alpha.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/publish_release.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/skill_tests.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/update_skill_json.yml (1 hunks)
- skill.json (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .github/workflows/publish_release.yml
- .github/workflows/update_skill_json.yml
Additional comments not posted (19)
.github/workflows/license_tests.yml (3)
1-1
: LGTM!The updated workflow name "Run License Tests" is more descriptive and clearly conveys the purpose of the workflow.
3-7
: LGTM!The updated trigger conditions are more comprehensive and ensure that the workflow runs on both direct pushes and pull requests to the
master
branch.
9-10
: Verify the impact of theuses
directive change.The
uses
directive has been updated to reference a different repository (neongeckocom/.github
) and branch (master
). This change suggests a move towards a more centralized or updated repository for managing license tests.Please ensure that the referenced repository and branch contain the necessary workflow files and actions to run the license tests effectively.
Run the following script to verify the existence of the referenced workflow file:
Verification successful
Verification successful: The
uses
directive change is valid.The
license_tests.yml
file exists in theneongeckocom/.github
repository on themaster
branch, confirming that the workflow is pointing to a valid resource. Ensure that the contents of this file are correctly configured for the intended license tests.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the referenced workflow file. # Test: Check if the referenced workflow file exists in the `neongeckocom/.github` repository. Expect: The file to exist. gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" /repos/neongeckocom/.github/contents/.github/workflows/license_tests.ymlLength of output: 3515
.github/workflows/publish_alpha.yml (4)
3-3
: LGTM!The workflow name change improves clarity by specifying that the workflow is for publishing alpha releases.
22-23
: Verify the job configuration changes.Ensure that:
- The job name change aligns with the updated workflow name and purpose.
- The change in the referenced repository is intentional and the new workflow file exists.
Run the following script to verify the job configuration changes:
Verification successful
Job configuration changes verified successfully.
The job name change and the reference to the new workflow file in the
neongeckocom/.github
repository are correct and intentional. Thepublish_alpha_release.yml
file exists and is accessible. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the job configuration changes. # Test: Search for the new workflow file in the referenced repository. # Expect: Workflow file exists. gh api \ --method GET \ -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \ /repos/neongeckocom/.github/contents/.github/workflows/publish_alpha_release.ymlLength of output: 9436
16-16
: Verify the impact of the trigger condition changes.Ensure that:
- Changes to
skill.json
do not trigger the workflow.- Changes to files in the
examples
directory trigger the workflow as expected.Run the following script to verify the trigger conditions:
Verification successful
Verification of Trigger Condition Changes
The changes to the trigger conditions in the workflow are correctly implemented. The inclusion of
skill.json
inpaths-ignore
ensures that changes to this file do not trigger the workflow. The removal of the exclusion forexamples/**
has no effect since theexamples
directory does not exist in the repository.
skill.json
is correctly ignored.examples
directory is absent, so its removal frompaths-ignore
has no impact.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the trigger condition changes. # Test 1: Search for the `skill.json` file. Expect: File exists. fd skill.json # Test 2: Search for the `examples` directory. Expect: Directory exists. fd examples -t dLength of output: 45
27-33
: Verify the parameter changes.Ensure that:
- The
version_file
parameter points to the correct file that contains the version information.- The new parameters are used correctly in the referenced workflow file.
Run the following script to verify the parameter changes:
.github/workflows/skill_tests.yml (4)
3-3
: LGTM!The new workflow name "Test Skill" is more descriptive and clearly conveys the purpose of the workflow.
10-10
: Verify the reason for the repository change.The
py_build_tests
job now uses a workflow from theneongeckocom
repository instead ofopenvoiceos
. Can you please provide some context on the reason for this change? Is it related to a new organizational structure or repository management strategy?
12-15
: LGTM!The changes to the
skill_unit_tests
job look good:
- The job now uses a workflow from the
neongeckocom
repository, aligning with the changes made to other jobs in the workflow.- The expanded Python version range (
neon_versions
andovos_versions
) enhances the compatibility checks for the skill.
16-22
: Clarify thetest_padacioso
andtest_padatious
parameters.The addition of the new
skill_intent_tests
job looks good as it expands the testing capabilities to include intent-related tests and aligns with the repository changes made to other jobs in the workflow.However, can you please provide some clarification on the
test_padacioso
andtest_padatious
parameters? What do these parameters control, and why istest_padacioso
set tofalse
whiletest_padatious
is set totrue
?.github/workflows/propose_release.yml (5)
1-1
: LGTM!The workflow name change from "Propose Stable Build" to "Propose Stable Release" accurately reflects the shift in focus from building to releasing.
7-11
: LGTM!The changes to the
release_type
input options, including the removal of the "patch" option and the introduction of the "build" option, are approved. These changes appropriately modify the semantics of the release types available for selection.
13-23
: LGTM!The
update_version
job is a well-structured replacement for the previousbuild_and_publish
job. By utilizing a dedicated repository (neongeckocom/.github
) and providing granular control over version variables and changelog updates, it enhances the workflow's version management capabilities. The job's configuration, including the specified parameters and thedev
branch operation, is approved.
25-32
: LGTM!The introduction of the
pull_changes
job is a valuable addition to the workflow. By establishing a clear dependency on theupdate_version
job and handling pull request creation with parameters for assignee, draft status, title, and body, it enhances the workflow's control flow and ensures systematic pull request management. The job's configuration and its utilization of the outputs from theupdate_version
job are approved.
1-32
: Excellent work!The overall changes to the workflow are well-structured and contribute significantly to the improvement of the release process. The modifications, including the renaming of the workflow, the alteration of job configurations, and the introduction of the
update_version
andpull_changes
jobs, enhance clarity, functionality, and systematic handling of version updates and pull requests. The workflow's design and implementation are approved.skill.json (3)
3-3
: LGTM!The change to the
url
field is approved. The new URL points to the correct repository under the new ownership.
51-51
: LGTM!The change to the
skillname
field is approved. The new skill name follows the naming convention and reflects the rebranding.
52-52
: LGTM!The change to the
authorname
field is approved. The new author name matches the GitHub username and reflects the new ownership.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me
Switching over to OVOS release automations for consistency |
Preparation for stable releases
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores