Merged
Conversation
Contributor
emnul
approved these changes
Jun 23, 2025
Contributor
Author
andrew-fleming
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR proposes to eliminate the biome <> yarn formatting conflict by ignoring package.json in biome's formatter config. The package.json is already being formatted by yarn and AFAICT the path of least resistance is to ignore it in biome. We could change how yarn is operating, but there are some tradeoffs and for this type of issue, I don't think it's worth it
Fixes #142
PR Checklist