MBCn - Why an univariate adjustment before applying NpdfTransform? #1894
-
Setup Information
ContextI would like to apply the MBCn algorithm to Euro-CORDEX data. I followed this helpful tutorial: I successfully reproduced the example. However, I’m curious about why a univariate adjustment is performed before applying the N-dimensional probability density function transform. I understand that the univariate adjustments are used afterward, but in Cannon (2018), isn’t the NpdfTransform applied to the standardized raw data? Perhaps it doesn’t make much difference. I tested using the raw standardized stacked data, and it produces similar (by eye, I haven't investigated much) results. I thought the reason might be related to the convergence speed of the algorithm. However, the E-score converges similarly in both cases. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this and for taking the time to develop this useful package. Sylvain Steps To Reproduce
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi Sylvain, You are right, in (Cannon, 2018), we first have:
In the
I also concluded there was not much difference, but in newer version of Both the standardization and univariate QDM are now performed in a single class Let me know if you have more questions. Cheers, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi Sylvain,
You are right, in (Cannon, 2018), we first have:
In the
xclim
notebook you point out, we had:I also concluded there was not much difference, but in newer version of
xclim
, we follow the exact methology proposed in (Cannon, 2018).Both the standardization and univariate QDM are now performed in a single class
MBCn
in recent versions ofxclim
, you can see recent notebo…