Workflow optimisations #1859
Merged
Workflow optimisations #1859
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Note It appears that this Pull Request modifies the On inspection, the No further action is required. |
Zeitsperre
force-pushed
the
workflow-optimisations
branch
from
eb15b22
to
a1b9df3
Compare
github-actions
bot
added
information
2 tasks
|
Sorry to ask for a re-review. Will be performing a squash+merge to not pollute the git history. |
aulemahal
approved these changes
Aug 1, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request Checklist:
number) and pull request (:pull:number) has been addedWhat kind of change does this PR introduce?
tox-ghhas been configured to settoxenvironments on GitHub Workflowstox.inifile is a bit more organized/consistent.upstream.ymlwas adapted to not use hashes (impossible to install directly from GitHub sources using--require-hashes).Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No. Tests on GitHub have been changed around a bit, but the coverage should be unaffected. Preliminary tests now skip the slow tests.