Add reference to new divisions macrohood subtype

[stepps00]

Category

What kind of change is this?
Please select one of the following four options.
Consult Pull request merging criteria for a description of each category.

1. Cosmetic change.
2. Documentation change by member.
3. Documentation change by Overture tech writer.
4. Material change.

Description

In October, the Divisions theme will see features at a new macrohood subtype. This pull request adds references and definitions for the new subtype to the division.mdx and division_area.mdx files.

TODO.

Reference

https://github.com/OvertureMaps/tf-admin/issues/132

1. TODO.

Testing

Brief description of the testing done for this change showing why you are confident it works as expected and does not introduce regressions. Provide sample output data where appropriate.

TODO.

Checklist

Checklist of tasks commonly-associated with schema pull requests. Please review the relevant checklists and ensure you do all the tasks that are required for the change you made.

1. Add relevant examples.
2. Add relevant counterexamples.
3. Update any counterexamples that became obsolete. For example, if a counterexample uses property A but is not intended to test property A's validity, and you made a schema change that invalidates property A in that counterexample, fix the counterexample to align it with your schema change.
4. Update in-schema documentation using plain English written in complete sentences, if an update is required.
5. Update Docusaurus documentation, if an update is required.
6. Review change with Overture technical writer to ensure any advanced documentation needs will be taken care of, unless the change is trivial and would not affect the documentation.

Documentation Website

Update the hyperlink below to put the pull request number in.

Docs preview for this PR.

[danabauer]

thanks for updating this

[vcschapp]

@stepps00 is this still work in progress? (Has [WIP] in the title.)

Also, was there a schema change to go along with this docs change?

[stepps00]

Thanks, I just removed [WIP] from the title.

I don't think a schema change is required here since we're only adding a new value to an existing field (subtype).

[stepps00]

@vcschapp commits updated, this should be ready to merge.