Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question] TF Serving Support #6

Open
terrykong opened this issue Aug 18, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

[Question] TF Serving Support #6

terrykong opened this issue Aug 18, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@terrykong
Copy link

terrykong commented Aug 18, 2020

Hi,

I was curious if seamless integration with TF Serving is on the roadmap?

I see that there is support for remote models here remote_model.py, but is there anything beyond that we can look forward to?

We usually have a model server running that serves our models, so it would be great to reuse the models and resources allocated to the model server.

Thanks!

@iftenney
Copy link
Collaborator

It's on the roadmap to have more "seamless" integration with more frameworks, including TensorFlow Serving, but no ETA yet.

That being said: for a specific model, if you have a Python class that can call the model server, it should be fairly easy to map the flat dict format of PredictRequest/PredictResponse onto LIT types (see https://github.com/PAIR-code/lit/blob/main/docs/python_api.md#models).

@iftenney iftenney added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 1, 2020
aryan1107 added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 2, 2022
Use more sensible default values for settings in the clustering module.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants