Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove PT_qbid_limit_switch parameter and it's assocated False code #2823

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

martinholmer
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #2822 confusion without any restriction on ability to specify a PT_qbid_limit_switch==False reform (as discussed here).

@martinholmer martinholmer reopened this Oct 4, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.42%. Comparing base (af96206) to head (9ecf038).
Report is 13 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2823   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.42%   99.42%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        2613     2613           
=======================================
  Hits         2598     2598           
  Misses         15       15           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.42% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@martinholmer martinholmer merged commit e35dae3 into PSLmodels:master Oct 11, 2024
10 of 16 checks passed
@martinholmer martinholmer deleted the simplify-qbid-logic branch October 11, 2024 14:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

QBID income limit switch
1 participant